Re: Linux/FreeBSD Channel Bonding Interoperability

2005-05-28 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 11:27:55AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > how you do it depends entirely on how they are doing the bonding in Linux. > you do not give any clues as to what modules they are using. Linux supports many different modes, the most standard one probably beeing 802.3ad.

Re: Linux/FreeBSD Channel Bonding Interoperability

2005-05-28 Thread Chris Dionissopoulos
I've read about ng_fec and ng_onetomany, so I know channel bonding is quite easy (seems so, according to web pages I've found) but I guess FreeBSD and Linux won't work correctly. If that's the case, I wondered if it could be possible to add a new node to "translate" stuff so that both could

Re: Linux/FreeBSD Channel Bonding Interoperability

2005-05-28 Thread Julian Elischer
probably this would be better in [EMAIL PROTECTED] Florent Thoumie wrote: Hey list. I'm advocating for FreeBSD for about 6 months now where I'm working and they have the project to build their own router (which will probably be based on WRAP). The good point is that the

Linux/FreeBSD Channel Bonding Interoperability

2005-05-27 Thread Florent Thoumie
Hey list. I'm advocating for FreeBSD for about 6 months now where I'm working and they have the project to build their own router (which will probably be based on WRAP). The good point is that the actual solution is running Linux but it's not high