Re: Kernel Support for System Call Performance Monitoring

Hi, Thank you so much for your constructive notes. We do feel confident to merge some parts into the mainline code. Other parts may require further discussion: Bosko Milekic wrote: > 1) User-visible DeBoxInfo structure has the magic number "5" >PerSleepInfo structs and the magic numbe

Re: Kernel Support for System Call Performance Monitoring

On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 01:20:03PM -0400, Yaoping Ruan wrote: > We have been working on improving Web server performance on > FreeBSD, and think you may be interested in the results and > techniques we used. Specifically, we focus on the SpecWeb99 > benchmark and the Flash Web Server, and have rou

Re: Kernel Support for System Call Performance Monitoring

Hi, Thanks for your interests. Just clarify that it is not a patch to boost kernel performance, but for the performance debugging tool we built, DeBox. We should be able to release the patch in a few days. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'd be very interested in a copy of the patches, I have several

Kernel Support for System Call Performance Monitoring

We have been working on improving Web server performance on FreeBSD, and think you may be interested in the results and techniques we used. Specifically, we focus on the SpecWeb99 benchmark and the Flash Web Server, and have roughly quadrupled its performance. We did this by adding support for a ve