As Brian F. Feldman wrote ...
> On Tue, 7 Sep 1999, Wilko Bulte wrote:
>
> > Wilko (confused...)
>
> No, I already committed the change to comment it out in -STABLE. I will
> investigate further, but I will definitely not have it in by -RELEASE time.
OK, clear. I was just worried it would silent
As Brian F. Feldman wrote ...
> On Tue, 7 Sep 1999, Wilko Bulte wrote:
>
> > Wilko (confused...)
>
> No, I already committed the change to comment it out in -STABLE. I will
> investigate further, but I will definitely not have it in by -RELEASE time.
OK, clear. I was just worried it would silen
On Tue, 7 Sep 1999, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> Wilko (confused...)
No, I already committed the change to comment it out in -STABLE. I will
investigate further, but I will definitely not have it in by -RELEASE time.
No problem has been noticed before because XFree86 has not supported MTRRs
until recentl
On Tue, 7 Sep 1999, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> Wilko (confused...)
No, I already committed the change to comment it out in -STABLE. I will
investigate further, but I will definitely not have it in by -RELEASE time.
No problem has been noticed before because XFree86 has not supported MTRRs
until recent
As Peter Wemm wrote ...
> Wilko Bulte wrote:
> > As Brian F. Feldman wrote ...
> > > On Sun, 5 Sep 1999, Randall Hopper wrote:
> > >
...
> > > corrupt other memory...) For now, it's unsafe.
> >
> > Maybe I'm missing the point here, but as a AMD user I'm interested anyway:
> > 'should be disabled'
As Peter Wemm wrote ...
> Wilko Bulte wrote:
> > As Brian F. Feldman wrote ...
> > > On Sun, 5 Sep 1999, Randall Hopper wrote:
> > >
...
> > > corrupt other memory...) For now, it's unsafe.
> >
> > Maybe I'm missing the point here, but as a AMD user I'm interested anyway:
> > 'should be disabled
Wilko Bulte wrote:
> As Brian F. Feldman wrote ...
> > On Sun, 5 Sep 1999, Randall Hopper wrote:
> >
> > > Mike Smith:
> > > |> Also, I wonder if you've seen/heard of an MTRR patch for 3.2-RELEASE
> > > |
> > > |You could try to backport the two sets of commits I just made to the
> > > |-stab
Wilko Bulte wrote:
> As Brian F. Feldman wrote ...
> > On Sun, 5 Sep 1999, Randall Hopper wrote:
> >
> > > Mike Smith:
> > > |> Also, I wonder if you've seen/heard of an MTRR patch for 3.2-RELEASE
> > > |
> > > |You could try to backport the two sets of commits I just made to the
> > > |-sta
As Brian F. Feldman wrote ...
> On Sun, 5 Sep 1999, Randall Hopper wrote:
>
> > Mike Smith:
> > |> Also, I wonder if you've seen/heard of an MTRR patch for 3.2-RELEASE
> > |
> > |You could try to backport the two sets of commits I just made to the
> > |-stable branch, but you might be better
As Brian F. Feldman wrote ...
> On Sun, 5 Sep 1999, Randall Hopper wrote:
>
> > Mike Smith:
> > |> Also, I wonder if you've seen/heard of an MTRR patch for 3.2-RELEASE
> > |
> > |You could try to backport the two sets of commits I just made to the
> > |-stable branch, but you might be better
On Sun, 5 Sep 1999, Randall Hopper wrote:
> Mike Smith:
> |> Also, I wonder if you've seen/heard of an MTRR patch for 3.2-RELEASE
> |
> |You could try to backport the two sets of commits I just made to the
> |-stable branch, but you might be better off moving to -stable or to
> |3.3-RELEASE
On Sun, 5 Sep 1999, Randall Hopper wrote:
> Mike Smith:
> |> Also, I wonder if you've seen/heard of an MTRR patch for 3.2-RELEASE
> |
> |You could try to backport the two sets of commits I just made to the
> |-stable branch, but you might be better off moving to -stable or to
> |3.3-RELEAS
Mike Smith:
|> Also, I wonder if you've seen/heard of an MTRR patch for 3.2-RELEASE
|
|You could try to backport the two sets of commits I just made to the
|-stable branch, but you might be better off moving to -stable or to
|3.3-RELEASE.
Ok, I might try that. From Brian's message, it soun
Mike Smith:
|> Also, I wonder if you've seen/heard of an MTRR patch for 3.2-RELEASE
|
|You could try to backport the two sets of commits I just made to the
|-stable branch, but you might be better off moving to -stable or to
|3.3-RELEASE.
Ok, I might try that. From Brian's message, it sou
> Brian F. Feldman:
> |Randall Hopper:
> |> Does FreeBSD support Write Combining on K6 processors?
> |
> |Do you mean the MTRR support for K6-2 and above? Yes, that's in 3.3 and 4.0.
>
> Great! Thanks.
>
> Do you know what the status is on the XFree86-FreeBSD MTRR interface
> that was b
> Brian F. Feldman:
> |Randall Hopper:
> |> Does FreeBSD support Write Combining on K6 processors?
> |
> |Do you mean the MTRR support for K6-2 and above? Yes, that's in 3.3 and 4.0.
>
> Great! Thanks.
>
> Do you know what the status is on the XFree86-FreeBSD MTRR interface
> that was
Brian F. Feldman:
|Well, from 3.9.16, I get
|(==) NV(0): Write-combining range (0xcc00,0x100)
:-)
|
|Nice to know that my work ...errr works.
Great! Thanks for the good piece of work.
|> Also, I wonder if you've seen/heard of an MTRR patch for 3.2-RELEAS
Brian F. Feldman:
|Well, from 3.9.16, I get
|(==) NV(0): Write-combining range (0xcc00,0x100):-)
|
|Nice to know that my work ...errr works.
Great! Thanks for the good piece of work.
|> Also, I wonder if you've seen/heard of an MTRR patch for 3.2-RELEAS
On Sun, 5 Sep 1999, Randall Hopper wrote:
> Brian F. Feldman:
> |Randall Hopper:
> |> Does FreeBSD support Write Combining on K6 processors?
> |
> |Do you mean the MTRR support for K6-2 and above? Yes, that's in 3.3 and 4.0.
>
> Great! Thanks.
>
> Do you know what the status is on the
Brian F. Feldman:
|Randall Hopper:
|> Does FreeBSD support Write Combining on K6 processors?
|
|Do you mean the MTRR support for K6-2 and above? Yes, that's in 3.3 and 4.0.
Great! Thanks.
Do you know what the status is on the XFree86-FreeBSD MTRR interface
that was being hammered out (t
On Sat, 4 Sep 1999, Randall Hopper wrote:
> Does FreeBSD support Write Combining on K6 processors?
>
> Randall
>
Do you mean the MTRR support for K6-2 and above? Yes, that's in 3.3 and 4.0.
--
Brian Fundakowski Feldman / "Any sufficiently advanced bug is\
gr...@freebsd.org
On Sun, 5 Sep 1999, Randall Hopper wrote:
> Brian F. Feldman:
> |Randall Hopper:
> |> Does FreeBSD support Write Combining on K6 processors?
> |
> |Do you mean the MTRR support for K6-2 and above? Yes, that's in 3.3 and 4.0.
>
> Great! Thanks.
>
> Do you know what the status is on the
Brian F. Feldman:
|Randall Hopper:
|> Does FreeBSD support Write Combining on K6 processors?
|
|Do you mean the MTRR support for K6-2 and above? Yes, that's in 3.3 and 4.0.
Great! Thanks.
Do you know what the status is on the XFree86-FreeBSD MTRR interface
that was being hammered out (
On Sat, 4 Sep 1999, Randall Hopper wrote:
> Does FreeBSD support Write Combining on K6 processors?
>
> Randall
>
Do you mean the MTRR support for K6-2 and above? Yes, that's in 3.3 and 4.0.
--
Brian Fundakowski Feldman / "Any sufficiently advanced bug is\
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does FreeBSD support Write Combining on K6 processors?
Randall
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Does FreeBSD support Write Combining on K6 processors?
Randall
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
26 matches
Mail list logo
