Re: Sv: K6/3 on 3.2-STABLE - PROBLEM SOLVED

1999-08-25 Thread Wes Peters
Matthew Dillon wrote: > > : > :Back around 1980, I overclocked my 5MHz z80 to 6MHz. It worked without > problems, except that for-next loops in comal didn't exit as expected. That > was also reproducible... > : > :Leif > > In the early 90's I regularly ran 10 MHz 68000's at 20 MHz (which wa

Re: Sv: K6/3 on 3.2-STABLE - PROBLEM SOLVED

1999-08-25 Thread Wes Peters
Matthew Dillon wrote: > > : > :Back around 1980, I overclocked my 5MHz z80 to 6MHz. It worked without problems, >except that for-next loops in comal didn't exit as expected. That was also >reproducible... > : > :Leif > > In the early 90's I regularly ran 10 MHz 68000's at 20 MHz (which was

Re: Sv: K6/3 on 3.2-STABLE - PROBLEM SOLVED

1999-08-25 Thread Matthew Dillon
: :Back around 1980, I overclocked my 5MHz z80 to 6MHz. It worked without problems, except that for-next loops in comal didn't exit as expected. That was also reproducible... : :Leif In the early 90's I regularly ran 10 MHz 68000's at 20 MHz (which was about the limit the dynamic ram at

Sv: K6/3 on 3.2-STABLE - PROBLEM SOLVED

1999-08-25 Thread Leif Neland
> > > > After rechecking all the jumpers it turns out that the supplier > > had set the core voltage to 2.2V instead of 2.4V! > > Interesting that the error was reproducible, if this was the cause of > it. The problem never varied from that exact point? I'd like to say > that I find that a

Re: Sv: K6/3 on 3.2-STABLE - PROBLEM SOLVED

1999-08-25 Thread Matthew Dillon
: :Back around 1980, I overclocked my 5MHz z80 to 6MHz. It worked without problems, :except that for-next loops in comal didn't exit as expected. That was also :reproducible... : :Leif In the early 90's I regularly ran 10 MHz 68000's at 20 MHz (which was about the limit the dynamic ram

Sv: K6/3 on 3.2-STABLE - PROBLEM SOLVED

1999-08-25 Thread Leif Neland
> > > > After rechecking all the jumpers it turns out that the supplier > > had set the core voltage to 2.2V instead of 2.4V! > > Interesting that the error was reproducible, if this was the cause of > it. The problem never varied from that exact point? I'd like to say > that I find that a

Re: K6/3 on 3.2-STABLE - PROBLEM SOLVED

1999-08-25 Thread Gregory Sutter
On Tue, Aug 24, 1999 at 03:44:32PM -0700, John Plevyak wrote: > On Tue, Aug 24, 1999 at 02:33:48PM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote: > > :I am experiencing reproducible crashes with FreeBSD (3.2-STABLE) on > > :a K6/3-450 running on an ASUS P5S-VM motherboard. The problem is highly > > :repeatable (ha

Re: K6/3 on 3.2-STABLE - PROBLEM SOLVED

1999-08-25 Thread Gregory Sutter
On Tue, Aug 24, 1999 at 03:44:32PM -0700, John Plevyak wrote: > On Tue, Aug 24, 1999 at 02:33:48PM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote: > > :I am experiencing reproducible crashes with FreeBSD (3.2-STABLE) on > > :a K6/3-450 running on an ASUS P5S-VM motherboard. The problem is highly > > :repeatable (h

Re: K6/3 on 3.2-STABLE - PROBLEM SOLVED

1999-08-24 Thread John Plevyak
After rechecking all the jumpers it turns out that the supplier had set the core voltage to 2.2V instead of 2.4V! Thanx for all the help! john On Tue, Aug 24, 1999 at 02:33:48PM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote: > :I am experiencing reproducible crashes with FreeBSD (3.2-STABLE) on > :a K6/3-45

Re: K6/3 on 3.2-STABLE - PROBLEM SOLVED

1999-08-24 Thread John Plevyak
After rechecking all the jumpers it turns out that the supplier had set the core voltage to 2.2V instead of 2.4V! Thanx for all the help! john On Tue, Aug 24, 1999 at 02:33:48PM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote: > :I am experiencing reproducible crashes with FreeBSD (3.2-STABLE) on > :a K6/3-4