On Monday 11 December 2006 10:34, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> I saw your (2004) post about the watchdog driver for the i8xx and I was
> wondering if you could send it to me?
Whoops, no wonder I didn't get a reply.
Not to menion it's already committed :)
--
Daniel O'Connor software and network engi
Correction...
On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 11:26:59PM +, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> I wrote code to unlock the SMM within FreeBSD last summer on an IBM T22
^^ discover and map.
> with the 440BX chipset. Here it is.
Half asleep here. Doh!
BMS
___
On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 05:40:33PM -0500, Don Bowman wrote:
> SMI under freebsd? Ha ha... Good luck! It didn't look very
> easy. The SMM, for those who don't know it, is a virtual
> 86, real-mode thing, at a location in ram which is locked
> and unaccessible unless you are in smm mode :) If you
> a
From: Doug Ambrisko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Don Bowman writes:
> | The Intel ICH3 (and probably all) has the feature it can
> | issue an SMI on first count-down to 0, then a hard reset
> | on 2nd. What we did was implement an SMM handler (in bios)
> | that, when called due to watchdog, issued a
Don Bowman writes:
| The Intel ICH3 (and probably all) has the feature it can
| issue an SMI on first count-down to 0, then a hard reset
| on 2nd. What we did was implement an SMM handler (in bios)
| that, when called due to watchdog, issued an NMI and did
| a return from smm.
| In FreeBSD, an NMI
From: Doug Ambrisko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Scott Long writes:
> | In reading the code, it appears that it is indeed an ICHx
> service and
> | not limited to just i8xx chipsets. I have a few issues with how the
> | probe and attach are done, and I'm addressing these in a
> private mail
> | r
Scott Long writes:
| In reading the code, it appears that it is indeed an ICHx service and
| not limited to just i8xx chipsets. I have a few issues with how the
| probe and attach are done, and I'm addressing these in a private mail
| right now. It's funny that I was reading the Intel ICH5 docs l
Doug Ambrisko wrote:
Scott Long writes:
| Wm. Daryl Hawkins wrote:
| > I've written a driver for the Intel i8xx TCO watchdog timer for both
| > FreeBSD-CURRENT and FreeBSD-STABLE.
|
| This is wonderful. I'd be happy to test it and shepherd it in. Does it
| support the intel 750x chips also?
A
Scott Long writes:
| Wm. Daryl Hawkins wrote:
| > I've written a driver for the Intel i8xx TCO watchdog timer for both
| > FreeBSD-CURRENT and FreeBSD-STABLE.
|
| This is wonderful. I'd be happy to test it and shepherd it in. Does it
| support the intel 750x chips also?
All ICH chips that I'v
Wm. Daryl Hawkins wrote:
I've written a driver for the Intel i8xx TCO watchdog timer for both FreeBSD-CURRENT and FreeBSD-STABLE. This is my first driver and it's only seen limited testing, so proceed with caution! The FreeBSD-CURRENT package contains a loadable kernel module and was written to w
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 11:35 AM
To: Wm. Daryl Hawkins
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Intel i8xx watchdog driver
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Wm. Da
ryl Hawkins" writes:
>
>I've written a driver for the Intel i8xx TCO watchdog timer for
&
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Wm. Da
ryl Hawkins" writes:
>
>I've written a driver for the Intel i8xx TCO watchdog timer for
>both FreeBSD-CURRENT and FreeBSD-STABLE.
Is this written against the API in -current ?
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've written a driver for the Intel i8xx TCO watchdog timer for both FreeBSD-CURRENT
and FreeBSD-STABLE. This is my first driver and it's only seen limited testing, so
proceed with caution! The FreeBSD-CURRENT package contains a loadable kernel module
and was written to work with Poul-Henning
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 07:07:36PM -0600, Wm. Daryl Hawkins wrote:
> I would love to incorporate it in both source trees if possible. Before
> it goes into current, I need to make some changes so that it will work
> with Poul-Henning Kamp's new watchdog driver model. Hopefully, I'll get
> to work
Wm. Daryl Hawkins
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Intel i8xx watchdog driver
Wow, this is great! I tried it out on a few RELENG_4 boxes and it works
as expected
wdog0 on motherboard
isab0: Found Intel 82801DB watchdog device
Are there any plans to incorporate this into the 5.x and 4.x source
tr
rent
as soon as it's ready.
-- Daryl
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tancsa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 9:17 PM
To: Wm. Daryl Hawkins
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Intel i8xx watchdog driver
Wow, this is great! I tried it out on a few RELENG_4 b
Wow, this is great! I tried it out on a few RELENG_4 boxes and it
works as expected
wdog0 on motherboard
isab0: Found Intel 82801DB watchdog device
Are there any plans to incorporate this into the 5.x and 4.x source
tree ? This would be useful to a lot of people.
---Mike
On Wed, 10
I've written a driver and userland daemon for the Intel i8xx TCO watchdog timer. This
is my first driver and it's only seen limited testing, so proceed with caution! I've
tested it with 4.9 and 5.2.1 on a Supermicro P4SGE motherboard and would be grateful
for any suggestions, comments, bug re
18 matches
Mail list logo
