> > Attached below is a port of NetBSD's patch to FreeBSD's dump(8).
> > dump's tree walker is a little weird, so the patch is a little more
> > complicated than calling fts_set with FTS_SKIP. For the technical
> > details of what it does, see:
> > http://lists.openresources.com/NetBSD/tech-kern/
> Attached below is a port of NetBSD's patch to FreeBSD's dump(8).
> dump's tree walker is a little weird, so the patch is a little more
> complicated than calling fts_set with FTS_SKIP. For the technical
> details of what it does, see:
> http://lists.openresources.com/NetBSD/tech-kern/msg00453.h
d find
> applicable on a daily basis :-).
>
> Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Project
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] NAI Labs, Safeport Network Services
>
> On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, Dima Dorfman wrote:
>
> > Hello -hackers
> >
> > Some
ag should be
> inherited (see 'inheriting the "nodump" flag ?' around Dec. 2000).
> This was generally considered a good idea, however, the patch to the
> kernel he proposed was thought an ugly hack. In addition, jeroen
> pointed out that NetBSD had implemented this funct
Hello -hackers
Some time ago, on -arch, phk proposed that the nodump flag should be
inherited (see 'inheriting the "nodump" flag ?' around Dec. 2000).
This was generally considered a good idea, however, the patch to the
kernel he proposed was thought an ugly hack. In addi
5 matches
Mail list logo
