> > > I had blocked incoming TCP connections coming into my network using
> > > IPFW, and I noticed that my brother was able to establish a Napster
> > > connection, even though I had blocked it earlier.
> >
> > *sigh*
> >
> > Thanks to Guy Helmer for being patient with me as I fretted about thi
Nate Williams wrote:
>
> > I had blocked incoming TCP connections coming into my network using
> > IPFW, and I noticed that my brother was able to establish a Napster
> > connection, even though I had blocked it earlier.
>
> *sigh*
>
> Thanks to Guy Helmer for being patient with me as I fretted
> I had blocked incoming TCP connections coming into my network using
> IPFW, and I noticed that my brother was able to establish a Napster
> connection, even though I had blocked it earlier.
*sigh*
Thanks to Guy Helmer for being patient with me as I fretted about this.
I just found out that Na
> > I had blocked incoming TCP connections coming into my network using
> > IPFW, and I noticed that my brother was able to establish a Napster
> > connection, even though I had blocked it earlier.
> >
> > I thought, no worries, I'll just block it at the port level.
> >
> > I read a couple of ar
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Nate Williams wrote:
> I had blocked incoming TCP connections coming into my network using
> IPFW, and I noticed that my brother was able to establish a Napster
> connection, even though I had blocked it earlier.
>
> I thought, no worries, I'll just block it at the port leve
I had blocked incoming TCP connections coming into my network using
IPFW, and I noticed that my brother was able to establish a Napster
connection, even though I had blocked it earlier.
I thought, no worries, I'll just block it at the port level.
I read a couple of articles, and noted that conne
6 matches
Mail list logo