OK, I know I should not answer to this thread, but I do it anyway, sorry
for that.
On Wed, 22 Mar 2000, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> Generally speaking if a user wants to crash a machine, he can crash
> a machine. We've probably 'fixed' a dozen crashability holes in the
[...]
> For examp
> I don't see anything about session accouning in the pam_limits section
> of the html docs distributed with Redhat (this doesn't mean they're not
> present though ;-) What exactly does it do?
for example, this is very important on a ppp dial-up server:
$ grep maxlogins /etc/security/limits.conf
On Thu, Mar 23, 2000 at 10:01:33AM +0100, Egervary Gergely wrote:
> > > has anyone ported it to BSD?
> >
> > /etc/login.conf can set limits for you, in a possibly more flexable way.
>
> but login does not support session accounting that pam_limits.so does.
I don't see anything about session ac
> > has anyone ported it to BSD?
>
> /etc/login.conf can set limits for you, in a possibly more flexable way.
but login does not support session accounting that pam_limits.so does.
(it should support, but it's not implemented)
-- mauzi
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "un
On Thu, Mar 23, 2000 at 09:29:55AM +0100, Egervary Gergely wrote:
> > /etc/security/limits.conf
>
> mmm... this is for pam_limits.so in linux
>
> has anyone ported it to BSD?
/etc/login.conf can set limits for you, in a possibly more flexable way.
David.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to
> /etc/security/limits.conf
mmm... this is for pam_limits.so in linux
has anyone ported it to BSD?
-- mauzi
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
On Wed, 22 Mar 2000, Jim Bryant wrote:
> well, there are other ways to make a system slow to a crawl
> #!/bin/csh
> /usr/games/primes 1 4294967295 >&/dev/null&
> [...]
/etc/security/limits.conf
get the idea? :)
-Dan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd
:In reply:
:> This is cross-posted to both linux-kernel and freebsd-hackers, please
:> set your replies properly.
:>
:> > I found the following by accident playing with PVM. If you start the
:> > 'gexample' from the examples directory with dimension=1 and no of
:> > tasks=32 on one machine, i
* Jim Bryant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000322 14:19] wrote:
> In reply:
> > This is cross-posted to both linux-kernel and freebsd-hackers, please
> > set your replies properly.
> >
> > > I found the following by accident playing with PVM. If you start the
> > > 'gexample' from the examples directory w
In reply:
> This is cross-posted to both linux-kernel and freebsd-hackers, please
> set your replies properly.
>
> > I found the following by accident playing with PVM. If you start the
> > 'gexample' from the examples directory with dimension=1 and no of
> > tasks=32 on one machine, it becom
This is cross-posted to both linux-kernel and freebsd-hackers, please
set your replies properly.
> -- Forwarded message --
> Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 16:02:40 +0100
> From: Michael Lampe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: How a normal use
anybody want to try this on -current?
ron
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 16:02:40 +0100
From: Michael Lampe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: How a normal user can crash any linux system
I found the following by accident playing with PVM.
12 matches
Mail list logo
