re: Re: Hotmail (was Re: Insider's scoop: Why FreeBSD is dying)

2002-08-18 Thread chromexa
> ** Original Subject: Re: Hotmail (was Re: Insider's scoop: Why FreeBSD is dying) > ** Original Sender: Jordan K Hubbard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > ** Original Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2002 16:43:25 -0400 (EDT) > ** Original Message follows... > > Can we maybe stop de

Re: Hotmail (was Re: Insider's scoop: Why FreeBSD is dying)

2002-08-18 Thread Jordan K Hubbard
Can we maybe stop debating this and just have our postmaster do what he can to filter this kind of noise out? Recycled slashdot trolls are hardly the kind of content we want to see on [EMAIL PROTECTED] and what goes on in IRC has been repeatedly made clear to have nothing to do with the proje

Re: Hotmail (was Re: Insider's scoop: Why FreeBSD is dying)

2002-08-18 Thread Wouter Van Hemel
On Sun, 2002-08-18 at 19:34, Terry Lambert wrote: > > [...] > > So if they were widely deployed, you would expect maybe 8 VIPs > per colocation facility... but you would not expect them to be > in a large, contiguous netblock: you'd expect them to be 8 here, > and 8 there, etc., based on geograp

Hotmail (was Re: Insider's scoop: Why FreeBSD is dying)

2002-08-18 Thread Terry Lambert
Andy wrote: > Remember that Hotmail is a part of MSN, and they would have a need for that > many IP addresses, what with their "Internet content" service. Oh, I could definitely see Microsoft needing a lot of VIPs; they would need one per unique, deployed services, and potentially one per "brandi