Re: Giant lock, bce and uhc using the same irq

2008-11-17 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On Monday 17 November 2008, Ed Schouten wrote: > * Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > P.S. In 8.0 there is a new USB stack that is Giant-free. > > I'm not sure this is completely true. Maybe HPS could explain it in more > detail, but Giant still seems to be used pretty often. All the int

Re: Giant lock, bce and uhc using the same irq

2008-11-17 Thread Ed Schouten
* Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > P.S. In 8.0 there is a new USB stack that is Giant-free. I'm not sure this is completely true. Maybe HPS could explain it in more detail, but Giant still seems to be used pretty often. -- Ed Schouten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> WWW: http://80386.nl/ pgpCr

Re: Giant lock, bce and uhc using the same irq

2008-11-17 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 05:14:21PM +0200, Murat Balaban wrote: > Hello hackers, > > In one of my production servers (64-bit Intel Xeon machine) running > > 6.3-RELEASE-p4 (amd64) FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE-p4 #0: Fri Sep 12 17:07:19 > EEST 2008 > > I see this "top -S" output excerpt: > > 32 root

Giant lock, bce and uhc using the same irq

2008-11-17 Thread Murat Balaban
Hello hackers, In one of my production servers (64-bit Intel Xeon machine) running 6.3-RELEASE-p4 (amd64) FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE-p4 #0: Fri Sep 12 17:07:19 EEST 2008 I see this "top -S" output excerpt: 32 root 1 -68 -187 0K16K *Giant 0 48.3H 3.08% irq17: bce1 uhci1 What I get f