Re: GATEKEEPER.MCAST.NET again (unexpected traffic)

2004-05-10 Thread Chris Dillon
On Mon, 10 May 2004, TSaplin Mikhail wrote: > On Monday 10 May 2004 12:31, you wrote: > > On Sun, 9 May 2004, TSaplin Mikhail wrote: > > > Recently I wrote, that I have litle traffic to GATEKEEPER.MCAST.NET, > > > (tcpdump show this: > > > 20:32:41.496039 129dial.supernet.kz.52075 > GATEKEEPER.MCA

Re: GATEKEEPER.MCAST.NET again (unexpected traffic)

2004-05-10 Thread TSaplin Mikhail
On Monday 10 May 2004 12:31, you wrote: > On Sun, 9 May 2004, TSaplin Mikhail wrote: > > Recently I wrote, that I have litle traffic to GATEKEEPER.MCAST.NET, > > (tcpdump show this: > > 20:32:41.496039 129dial.supernet.kz.52075 > GATEKEEPER.MCAST.NET.1718: > > udp 31 ) > > > > David Malone <[EMAIL

Re: GATEKEEPER.MCAST.NET again (unexpected traffic)

2004-05-09 Thread Chris Dillon
On Sun, 9 May 2004, TSaplin Mikhail wrote: > Recently I wrote, that I have litle traffic to GATEKEEPER.MCAST.NET, > (tcpdump show this: > 20:32:41.496039 129dial.supernet.kz.52075 > GATEKEEPER.MCAST.NET.1718: udp 31 > ) > > David Malone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on my question wrote: > >Does sockstat sh

GATEKEEPER.MCAST.NET again (unexpected traffic)

2004-05-09 Thread TSaplin Mikhail
Recently I wrote, that I have litle traffic to GATEKEEPER.MCAST.NET, (tcpdump show this: 20:32:41.496039 129dial.supernet.kz.52075 > GATEKEEPER.MCAST.NET.1718: udp 31 ) David Malone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on my question wrote: >Does sockstat show which process is using port 52075? No, sockstat show n