On Sun, 27 Jan 2008, Mike Meyer wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:55:53 -0800 (PST) KAYVEN RIESE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008, Mike Meyer wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 12:24:36 -0800 (PST) KAYVEN RIESE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008, Dag-Erling Sm˙˙rgrav w
On Sun, 27 Jan 2008, Mike Meyer wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:55:53 -0800 (PST) KAYVEN RIESE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008, Mike Meyer wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 12:24:36 -0800 (PST) KAYVEN RIESE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:55:53 -0800 (PST) KAYVEN RIESE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 26 Jan 2008, Mike Meyer wrote:
> > On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 12:24:36 -0800 (PST) KAYVEN RIESE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >> On Sat, 26 Jan 2008, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> >>> KAYVEN RIESE <[EM
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008, Mike Meyer wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 12:24:36 -0800 (PST) KAYVEN RIESE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
KAYVEN RIESE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
.rpm is a package format, and comes with a tool set for using it. Most
(all?)
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 12:24:36 -0800 (PST) KAYVEN RIESE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Jan 2008, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
>
> > KAYVEN RIESE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> i don't recognize that as what i said, but i was trying to make the
> >> point that BSD DOESn't use rpm compres
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
KAYVEN RIESE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
i don't recognize that as what i said, but i was trying to make the
point that BSD DOESn't use rpm compression, and that was a point i
was trying to make in terms of comparison/contrast
I'm not sure what
KAYVEN RIESE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> i don't recognize that as what i said, but i was trying to make the
> point that BSD DOESn't use rpm compression, and that was a point i
> was trying to make in terms of comparison/contrast
I'm not sure what you mean by "rpm compression", since rpm is no
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
GNU/Linux isn't tied to rpm's;
Actually, rpm is part of the Linux Standard Base specification, which
all major distributions implement. Debian derivatives use dpkg, but
still have a full set of rpm tools.
Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> GNU/Linux isn't tied to rpm's;
Actually, rpm is part of the Linux Standard Base specification, which
all major distributions implement. Debian derivatives use dpkg, but
still have a full set of rpm tools. Most distributions have higher-
level package mana
On 2008-01-25 13:58, william wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That brings me to another ponder: why juniper and cisco are using
> FreeBSD and not Linux even Linux performs better in an UP environment?
That's probably something only Juniper and Cisco can answer with a
sufficiently high degree of c
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 01:58:51PM +0800, william wong wrote:
> That brings me to another ponder: why juniper and cisco are using
> FreeBSD and not Linux even Linux performs better in an UP environment?
Other posters have mentioned that there is a mix of Linux and BSD at
Cisco. I don't work there
"william wong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That brings me to another ponder: why juniper and cisco are using
> FreeBSD and not Linux even Linux performs better in an UP environment?
Who said Linux performs better in a UP environment?
UP performance is close to irrelevant these days anyway; ther
KAYVEN RIESE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I thought freeBSD 7 was still current "bleeding edge?"
No, that's FreeBSD 8. FreeBSD 7.0 is very close to release now, and you
can already run 7-STABLE if you want to.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jan 24, 2008, at 22:58 , william wong wrote:
That brings me to another ponder: why juniper and cisco are using
FreeBSD and not Linux even Linux performs better in an UP environment?
2008/1/25, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
"william wong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dag-Erling S
That brings me to another ponder: why juniper and cisco are using
FreeBSD and not Linux even Linux performs better in an UP environment?
2008/1/25, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> "william wong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > "willi
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:25:16 -0800 (PST) KAYVEN RIESE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Aren't the ports collection something that makes freeBSD stand out
> very differently than linux? also, no rpm, and the pkg_add utility.
> updating operating system with cvsup? buildworld? all these things
> ar
On Jan 24, 2008, at 3:28 PM, KAYVEN RIESE wrote:
I thought freeBSD 7 was still current "bleeding edge?"
Soon it will be the 'most current STABLE' branch; 8-CURRENT is
absolute bleeding edge.
-Garrett
PS Please bottom post :).
___
freebsd-hackers@
I thought freeBSD 7 was still current "bleeding edge?"
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
"william wong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Thanks for enlightening me on different aspects. Actually I found there are
many exciting network stack projects/overhaul happening in FreeBSD 8. I
Aren't the ports collection something that makes freeBSD stand out
very differently than linux? also, no rpm, and the pkg_add utility.
updating operating system with cvsup? buildworld? all these things
are different starkly, or are they not?
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Xin LI wrote:
-BEGIN PGP
william wong skrev:
Thanks for enlightening me on different aspects. Actually I found there are
many exciting network stack projects/overhaul happening in FreeBSD 8.
Take a look at http://wiki.freebsd.org/Networking if working on the
networking code in FreeBSD interests you.
--
Joel
_
"william wong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > "william wong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > It seems that Juniper favors the even number FreeBSD's.
> > Only because 5 was a dog. They probably stuck with 4 for a while, then
> > switched to 6 onc
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 11:11:05PM +0800, william wong wrote:
> 2008/1/24, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > "william wong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Thanks for enlightening me on different aspects. Actually I found there
> > > are
> > > many exciting network stack projects/over
2008/1/24, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> "william wong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Thanks for enlightening me on different aspects. Actually I found there are
> > many exciting network stack projects/overhaul happening in FreeBSD 8. I just
> > want to gear up myself and see what I
"william wong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thanks for enlightening me on different aspects. Actually I found there are
> many exciting network stack projects/overhaul happening in FreeBSD 8. I just
> want to gear up myself and see what I can do. I have got 6.3 installed and
> tweaking some of the
Thanks for enlightening me on different aspects. Actually I found there are
many exciting network stack projects/overhaul happening in FreeBSD 8. I just
want to gear up myself and see what I can do. I have got 6.3 installed and
tweaking some of the kernel modification and compilation process so tha
"william wong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Are there any docments or pointers to get me started hacking around my
> 6.3 asap? Building toochains, submitting patches etc or i just
> follow most of the conventions in the Linux kernel development
> community?
The toolchain is already in place,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
william wong wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Are there any docments or pointers to get me started hacking around my
> 6.3asap? Building toochains, submitting patches etc or i just
> follow most
> of the conventions in the Linux kernel development community?
I t
-24 15:32:18
收件人： freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
抄送：
主题： FreeBSD hacker 101
Hi,
Are there any docments or pointers to get me started hacking around my
6.3asap? Building toochains, submitting patches etc or i just
follow most
of the conventions in the Linux kernel development community
Hi,
Are there any docments or pointers to get me started hacking around my
6.3asap? Building toochains, submitting patches etc or i just
follow most
of the conventions in the Linux kernel development community?
regards,
william
___
freebsd-hackers@
29 matches
Mail list logo
