On May 27, 2008, at 6:33 PM, Brooks Davis wrote:
You probably know about the clang project, which tries to completely
replace the gcc parts needed for llvm-gcc ...
Yes. I haven't looked at it yet. It doesn't seem to be in Ports
yet. Any
takers? ;-)
Unless you make an evil port that does
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 07:23:52PM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote:
> Hello Stefan,
>
> (CC'ing this back to the list)
>
> * Stefan Esser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > this is great news! Can you provide your patches to upgrade the port
> > to 2.3-pre?
>
> I could, but I patched the ports rather poorl
Hello Stefan,
(CC'ing this back to the list)
* Stefan Esser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> this is great news! Can you provide your patches to upgrade the port
> to 2.3-pre?
I could, but I patched the ports rather poorly. The plists are
incorrect. I just incremented the version numbers, updated th
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 07:06:39PM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> First of all, for those of you who went to BSDCan, I hope you had a
> pleasant flight/trip back home. :-)
>
> On Saturday I went to the LLVM talk (see http://llvm.org/), which I
> really enjoyed. On Friday Remko Lo
Hello everyone,
First of all, for those of you who went to BSDCan, I hope you had a
pleasant flight/trip back home. :-)
On Saturday I went to the LLVM talk (see http://llvm.org/), which I
really enjoyed. On Friday Remko Lodder and I already talked with him
about the LLVM project. I was excited ab
5 matches
Mail list logo
