In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Terry Lambert writes:
: Are you sure it's not just a CMD640 IDE controller? They are
: known to have issues; Linux has a patch... FreeBSD used to, but
: I think it got yanked out, or was just turned off by default.
The CMD640 had many DMA corruption bugs. Many are
Terry Lambert wrote:
>
> David O'Brien wrote:
> > > > Well, since it didn't, I might as well explain the problem here too.
> > > > There are at least two major problems with VIA chips:
> > >
> > > [data curruption on VIA KT133/133A systems by pushing PCI and memory bus]
> > >
> > > Are you sure a
David O'Brien wrote:
> > > Well, since it didn't, I might as well explain the problem here too.
> > > There are at least two major problems with VIA chips:
> >
> > [data curruption on VIA KT133/133A systems by pushing PCI and memory bus]
> >
> > Are you sure about that?
>
> I am. I was having da
AIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2001 10:33 AM
Subject: Re: FreeBSD and Athlon Processors
>
> Erik Greenwald writes:
> > [Erik Greenwald too]
>
> >> I'm using both of those (iwill kk266) with
On a related topic, I wonder whether gcc 3.0 will improve Athon
compilations. I have a big number crunching program that runs just as
fast on Windows2000 on my laptop(1Ghz PPro), as on my monster 1.2G
Athlon DDR with FreeBSD. Rob.
"Søren Schmidt" wrote:
>
> It seems David O'Brien wrote:
> > O
It seems David O'Brien wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 12:11:15AM -0400, Charles Shannon Hendrix wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 08:33:36PM -0400, Albert D. Cahalan wrote:
> >
> > > Well, since it didn't, I might as well explain the problem here too.
> > > There are at least two major problem
On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 12:11:15AM -0400, Charles Shannon Hendrix wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 08:33:36PM -0400, Albert D. Cahalan wrote:
>
> > Well, since it didn't, I might as well explain the problem here too.
> > There are at least two major problems with VIA chips:
>
> [data curruption
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 08:33:36PM -0400, Albert D. Cahalan wrote:
> Well, since it didn't, I might as well explain the problem here too.
> There are at least two major problems with VIA chips:
[data curruption on VIA KT133/133A systems by pushing PCI and memory bus]
Are you sure about that?
I
Erik Greenwald writes:
> [Erik Greenwald too]
>> I'm using both of those (iwill kk266) with a thunderbird 850, and
>> haven't had problems in fbsd. Linux flakes out a bit when I tell
>> it I have a k7 processor, so I told it I have a k6 and it works fine.
>
> sorry, this thread was supposed to s
>
> >
> >
> > > Yeah. As long as you avoid motherboards with the VIA KT133A/KT133
> > > chipset and the VIA 686B Southbridge, you're probably fine (not all such
> > > motherboards supposedly have problems, but how do you tell the
> > > difference?). For more info, check out:
>
> Well, I
>
>
> > Yeah. As long as you avoid motherboards with the VIA KT133A/KT133
> > chipset and the VIA 686B Southbridge, you're probably fine (not all such
> > motherboards supposedly have problems, but how do you tell the
> > difference?). For more info, check out:
Well, I've been using an a
> Yeah. As long as you avoid motherboards with the VIA KT133A/KT133
> chipset and the VIA 686B Southbridge, you're probably fine (not all such
> motherboards supposedly have problems, but how do you tell the
> difference?). For more info, check out:
I'm using both of those (iwill kk266)
12 matches
Mail list logo
