Re: FreeBSD Floppy driver needs enhancement...

2002-01-11 Thread Simon Dick
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 04:32:43PM -0500, Randell Jesup wrote: > Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >Randell Jesup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Back to the original question: do people care about floppies and > bad-sector recovery anymore? Aren't floppies on the very verge of

Re: FreeBSD Floppy driver needs enhancement...

2002-01-10 Thread Joerg Wunsch
As Julian Stacey wrote: > Would be nice, Joerg W. (cc'd) looked in that direction somewhat > I recall, I can't remember how far he got, I do recall some patches > I didnt get to try, can't remember quite what for, Joerg, can > you recall ? Use "fdread -r" for this (FreeBSD-current only). > An

Re: FreeBSD Floppy driver needs enhancement...

2002-01-10 Thread Terry Lambert
Christopher Weimann wrote: > On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 04:32:43PM -0500, Randell Jesup wrote: > > Back to the original question: do people care about floppies and > > bad-sector recovery anymore? Aren't floppies on the very verge of > > disappearing for good, replaced by CDRW's? > > > > M

Re: FreeBSD Floppy driver needs enhancement...

2002-01-10 Thread Christopher Weimann
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 04:32:43PM -0500, Randell Jesup wrote: > > Back to the original question: do people care about floppies and > bad-sector recovery anymore? Aren't floppies on the very verge of > disappearing for good, replaced by CDRW's? > Mine will all disapear once I manage d

Re: FreeBSD Floppy driver needs enhancement...

2002-01-10 Thread Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg
Randell Jesup wrote: [snip] > Back to the original question: do people care about floppies and > bad-sector recovery anymore? Aren't floppies on the very verge of > disappearing for good, replaced by CDRW's? I think we will have to assume that the floppy will hang around for some tim

Re: FreeBSD Floppy driver needs enhancement...

2002-01-10 Thread Randell Jesup
Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >Randell Jesup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yes (if anyone still cares about floppies). The old Amiga > > trackdisk (floppy driver) could do that, since all the decoding was in > > software (and via the graphics bitblitter(!)). Do the integrate

Re: FreeBSD Floppy driver needs enhancement...

2002-01-10 Thread Julian Stacey
Terry Lambert wrote: > Julian Stacey wrote: > > Doubtless some will have bad sectors by now. Here's a rescue tool: > > http://bim.bsn.com/~jhs/src/bsd/jhs/bin/public/valid/valid.c & vali > d.1 > > > > `Valid' runs on FreeBSD, but only rescues when running on MSDOS ! > > (because read() o

Re: FreeBSD Floppy driver needs enhancement...

2002-01-09 Thread Oliver Fromme
Randell Jesup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes (if anyone still cares about floppies). The old Amiga > trackdisk (floppy driver) could do that, since all the decoding was in > software (and via the graphics bitblitter(!)). Do the integrated disk > controllers in PC's (still) allow di

Re: FreeBSD Floppy driver needs enhancement...

2002-01-09 Thread Randell Jesup
Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >Julian Stacey wrote: >> Doubtless some will have bad sectors by now. Here's a rescue tool: >> http://bim.bsn.com/~jhs/src/bsd/jhs/bin/public/valid/valid.c & valid.1 >> >> `Valid' runs on FreeBSD, but only rescues when running on MSDOS ! >> (becau

FreeBSD Floppy driver needs enhancement...

2002-01-08 Thread Terry Lambert
Julian Stacey wrote: > Doubtless some will have bad sectors by now. Here's a rescue tool: > http://bim.bsn.com/~jhs/src/bsd/jhs/bin/public/valid/valid.c & valid.1 > > `Valid' runs on FreeBSD, but only rescues when running on MSDOS ! > (because read() on DOS3.2 returns the intact buffer e