On Saturday 29 October 2005 06:59 am, Rui Paulo wrote:
> On 2005.10.29 00:01:42 -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> | In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> |
> | Rui Paulo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | : On 2005.10.26 10:22:52 -0700, Bill Studenmund wrote:
> | : | On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 10:35
On 2005.10.29 00:01:42 -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
| In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| Rui Paulo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| : On 2005.10.26 10:22:52 -0700, Bill Studenmund wrote:
| : | On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 10:35:47PM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
| : | >
| : | > Main feature
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Rui Paulo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: On 2005.10.26 10:22:52 -0700, Bill Studenmund wrote:
: | On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 10:35:47PM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
: | >
: | > Main features:
: | >
: | > - Implements FreeBSD's devfs on NetBSD.
: |
: |
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 04:53:35PM -0400, der Mouse wrote:
> >>> - Implements FreeBSD's devfs on NetBSD.
> >> In the past, we (NetBSD folks) have talked about a devfs.
> >> [...persistence...]
> > FreeBSD 5+ has /etc/devfs.conf and /etc/devfs.rules [...]. Is that
> > what you're looking for?
>
>
On Thursday 27 October 2005 18:10, Bill Studenmund wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 09:29:52AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 05:48:06PM -0700, Bill Studenmund wrote:
> > > The reason I'm interested in locators is so that if devices renumber
> > > themselves, the permi
Bill Studenmund wrote this message on Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 10:22 -0700:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 10:35:47PM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> >
> > Main features:
> >
> > - Implements FreeBSD's devfs on NetBSD.
>
> In the past, we (NetBSD folks) have talked about a devfs. One issue that
> ha
On October 26, 2005 10:22 am, Bill Studenmund wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 10:35:47PM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> > Main features:
> > - Implements FreeBSD's devfs on NetBSD.
> In the past, we (NetBSD folks) have talked about a devfs. One issue
> that has come up (I'll be honest, I've
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 10:35:47PM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>
> Main features:
>
> - Implements FreeBSD's devfs on NetBSD.
In the past, we (NetBSD folks) have talked about a devfs. One issue that
has come up (I'll be honest, I've raised it a lot) is a desire to retain
permission chang
On Oct 26, 2005, at 10:22 AM, Bill Studenmund wrote:
In the past, we (NetBSD folks) have talked about a devfs. One issue
that
has come up (I'll be honest, I've raised it a lot) is a desire to
retain
permission changes across boots, and to tie devices (when possible)
to a
device-specific a
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jason Thorpe
writes:
>
>FWIW, I think a devfs based on our new tmpfs would be better for NetBSD.
>
I was under the impression that each i-node in tmpfs consumed a fair
amount of space, making it a bad match for things like /dev which have
very many i-nodes but n
have some clutter.
Personally, I prefer the macros.
-- Lennart
Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
Hi,
I have made an effort on making a FreeBSD 5/6/7 kernel emulator for NetBSD
2.x. Many device drivers are shared between these two operating systems, and
I think a lot of work can be saved when i
Hi,
I have made an effort on making a FreeBSD 5/6/7 kernel emulator for NetBSD
2.x. Many device drivers are shared between these two operating systems, and
I think a lot of work can be saved when it comes to porting code and patches
forth and back. Currently this emulator makes my FreeBSD PCI
12 matches
Mail list logo
