Re: FreeBSD 10G forwarding performance @Intel

2012-07-03 Thread Luigi Rizzo
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 12:31:56AM +0400, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote: > On 04.07.2012 00:27, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > >On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 09:37:38PM +0400, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote: > >... > >>Thanks, another good point. I forgot to merge this option from andre's > >>patch. > >> > >>Another

Re: FreeBSD 10G forwarding performance @Intel

2012-07-03 Thread Alexander V. Chernikov
On 04.07.2012 00:27, Luigi Rizzo wrote: On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 09:37:38PM +0400, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote: ... Thanks, another good point. I forgot to merge this option from andre's patch. Another 30-40-50kpps to win. not much gain though. What about the other IPSTAT_INC counters ? Well,

Re: FreeBSD 10G forwarding performance @Intel

2012-07-03 Thread Luigi Rizzo
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 09:37:38PM +0400, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote: ... > Thanks, another good point. I forgot to merge this option from andre's > patch. > > Another 30-40-50kpps to win. not much gain though. What about the other IPSTAT_INC counters ? I think the IPSTAT_INC macros were intro

Re: FreeBSD 10G forwarding performance @Intel

2012-07-03 Thread Alexander V. Chernikov
On 03.07.2012 20:55, Luigi Rizzo wrote: On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 08:11:14PM +0400, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote: Hello list! I'm quite stuck with bad forwarding performance on many FreeBSD boxes doing firewalling. ... In most cases system can forward no more than 700 (or 1400) kpps which is qu

Re: FreeBSD 10G forwarding performance @Intel

2012-07-03 Thread Luigi Rizzo
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 08:11:14PM +0400, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote: > Hello list! > > I'm quite stuck with bad forwarding performance on many FreeBSD boxes > doing firewalling. ... > In most cases system can forward no more than 700 (or 1400) kpps which > is quite a bad number (Linux does, s

FreeBSD 10G forwarding performance @Intel

2012-07-03 Thread Alexander V. Chernikov
Hello list! I'm quite stuck with bad forwarding performance on many FreeBSD boxes doing firewalling. Typical configuration is E5645 / E5675 @ Intel 82599 NIC. HT is turned off. (Configs and tunables below). I'm mostly concerned with unidirectional traffic flowing to single interface (e.g. us