Re: Faster Malloc

Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: (regarding Hoard: ) > This allocator is pretty much what the Dynix allocator is, it wouldn't be > difficult to clean-room implement this with a BSD license. > > They should have given credit to Dynix or at le

Re: Faster Malloc

On Wed, 8 Dec 1999, Kip Macy wrote: > > From: Rayson Ho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/emery/hoard/ > > > > > > Only Linux,Solaris,IRIX,NT, and BeOS supported at this > > > stage. Anyone wants to port it to FreeBSD? > > > > > > Sorry if everyone knows this already.

Re: Faster Malloc

e current FreeBSD pthread > implementation, because userland threads shouldn't suffer from > multiprocessor contention. > > Later, > scott > > - Original Message - > From: Rayson Ho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >

Re: Faster Malloc

From: Rayson Ho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 1999 10:09 AM Subject: Faster Malloc > > http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/emery/hoard/ > > Only Linux,Solaris,IRIX,NT, and BeOS supported at this > stage. Anyone wants to port it to

Faster Malloc

http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/emery/hoard/ Only Linux,Solaris,IRIX,NT, and BeOS supported at this stage. Anyone wants to port it to FreeBSD? Sorry if everyone knows this already... Rayson __ Do You Yahoo!? Thousands of Stores. Millions of