On Monday 01 November 2004 16:09, Martes Wigglesworth wrote:
> My kernel panic seems to come from the usb port actually having a device
> in the port, at boot. When I do not have a device in the port, bootup
> continues, however, my usb ports are not usable. This is my dmesg
> output.
>
> > dmesg
Martin Nilsson wrote:
Martes Wigglesworth wrote:
My kernel panic seems to come from the usb port actually having a device
in the port, at boot. When I do not have a device in the port, bootup
continues, however, my usb ports are not usable. This is my dmesg
output.
I have the same problem with a
Martes Wigglesworth wrote:
My kernel panic seems to come from the usb port actually having a device
in the port, at boot. When I do not have a device in the port, bootup
continues, however, my usb ports are not usable. This is my dmesg
output.
I have the same problem with a SeverWorks P3 machine
My kernel panic seems to come from the usb port actually having a device
in the port, at boot. When I do not have a device in the port, bootup
continues, however, my usb ports are not usable. This is my dmesg
output.
> dmesg|grep usb
usb0: on uhci0
usb0: USB revision 1.0
usb1: on uhci1
usb1: U
My kernel panic seems to come from the usb port actually having a device
in the port, at boot. When I do not have a device in the port, bootup
continues, however, my usb ports are not usable. This is my dmesg
output.
> dmesg|grep usb
usb0: on uhci0
usb0: USB revision 1.0
usb1: on uhci1
usb1: U
Greetings. Does anyone know why the ehci kernel option, which is
supposed to at least work for testing, gives me a kernel panic, whenever
I use it, on the below-listed system specs?
ps: If this is not the correct option, then I would appreciate your help
in finding the right forum/IRC channel is
6 matches
Mail list logo
