On Tue, 13 Jul 1999, Greg Lehey wrote:
> In fact, the most interesting thing about this (rather large) document
> is that it's the best documentation I've seen on klds. I don't know
> why anybody would want to use it for compromising security, since it's
> a *lot* of work, and to even get as far
On Tue, 13 Jul 1999, Greg Lehey wrote:
> In fact, the most interesting thing about this (rather large) document
> is that it's the best documentation I've seen on klds. I don't know
> why anybody would want to use it for compromising security, since it's
> a *lot* of work, and to even get as far
People, how much attention are you going to get to this topic with a
subject line like "(forw)"?
On Monday, 12 July 1999 at 12:28:03 +, crypt0genic wrote:
>
> Have you all seen this?
> To: bugt...@securityfocus.com
>
> Hi folks,
>
> THC released a new article dealing with FreeBSD 3.x
> Kernel
People, how much attention are you going to get to this topic with a
subject line like "(forw)"?
On Monday, 12 July 1999 at 12:28:03 +, crypt0genic wrote:
>
> Have you all seen this?
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Hi folks,
>
> THC released a new article dealing with FreeBSD 3.x
> Kernel modules
4 matches
Mail list logo
