Quoting Antony Mawer (from Mon, 24 Aug 2009 10:34:46 +1000):
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 2:38 AM, Marc Balmer wrote:
Is there a summary (perhaps something suitable to go on the Project
Ideas page) that outlines:
- An outline of what such a system should provide
- What it should NOT provide (ie.
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 2:38 AM, Marc Balmer wrote:
> Am 23.08.2009 um 18:24 schrieb Alexander Leidinger:
>> On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 17:13:42 +0200 Marc Balmer wrote:
>>> Am 23.08.2009 um 17:08 schrieb Alexander Leidinger:
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 21:02:32 +0200 "Aurélien Méré"
wrote:
>>
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 06:38:12PM +0200, Marc Balmer wrote:
> Everyone should have the right to come back with a subject, if work
> is put into it. Or is the stanza that once there has been a heated
> discussion about a topic, there is no possibility to come back to
> it, maybe making it better a
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 17:13:42 +0200 Marc Balmer wrote:
>
> Am 23.08.2009 um 17:08 schrieb Alexander Leidinger:
>
> > On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 21:02:32 +0200 "Aurélien Méré"
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I'm just afraid by reading your email that the situation doesn't
> >> seem to have evolved since the discu
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 21:02:32 +0200 "Aurélien Méré"
wrote:
> I'm just afraid by reading your email that the situation doesn't seem
> to have evolved since the discussion regarding the SoC, maybe even
> more taboo, and that I'll have to keep writing my own software and
> drivers to get the data
Am 23.08.2009 um 18:24 schrieb Alexander Leidinger:
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 17:13:42 +0200 Marc Balmer wrote:
Am 23.08.2009 um 17:08 schrieb Alexander Leidinger:
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 21:02:32 +0200 "Aurélien Méré"
wrote:
I'm just afraid by reading your email that the situation doesn't
s
Am 23.08.2009 um 17:08 schrieb Alexander Leidinger:
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 21:02:32 +0200 "Aurélien Méré"
wrote:
I'm just afraid by reading your email that the situation doesn't seem
to have evolved since the discussion regarding the SoC, maybe even
more taboo, and that I'll have to keep wri
As terribly clever as you all are, can you please restrict the
political commentary/humor/whatever to -chat?
Thanks,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mai
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009, Julian Elischer wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Alexander Leidinger [090822 10:44] wrote:
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 00:04:10 -0700 Julian Elischer
wrote:
The purists won out in that one by shouting loudly and screaming
about socialized hea
>> The OpenBSD sensors framework lacks some desireable features, e.g.
>> event capabilities like getting an event if a certain threshold is
>> exceeded. And it propbably was used for things that it better had
>
> This assumes the kernel is monitoring the device periodically (in the
> general case,
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Alexander Leidinger [090822 10:44] wrote:
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 00:04:10 -0700 Julian Elischer
wrote:
The purists won out in that one by shouting loudly and screaming
about socialized healthware. Consequently we have 47 million
unsuppo
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Alexander Leidinger [090822 10:44] wrote:
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 00:04:10 -0700 Julian Elischer
wrote:
The purists won out in that one by shouting loudly and screaming
about socialized healthware. Consequently we have 47 million
unsupported devices.
You forgot to tell
* Alexander Leidinger [090822 10:44] wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 00:04:10 -0700 Julian Elischer
> wrote:
>
> > The purists won out in that one by shouting loudly and screaming
> > about socialized healthware. Consequently we have 47 million
> > unsupported devices.
>
> You forgot to tell that
Am 22.08.2009 um 18:29 schrieb Alexander Leidinger:
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 08:50:23 +0200 Marc Balmer wrote:
The OpenBSD sensors framework lacks some desireable features, e.g.
event capabilities like getting an event if a certain threshold is
exceeded. And it propbably was used for things that
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 00:04:10 -0700 Julian Elischer
wrote:
> The purists won out in that one by shouting loudly and screaming
> about socialized healthware. Consequently we have 47 million
> unsupported devices.
You forgot to tell that now nobody wants to touch this subject anymore,
as he may be
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 08:50:23 +0200 Marc Balmer wrote:
> The OpenBSD sensors framework lacks some desireable features, e.g.
> event capabilities like getting an event if a certain threshold is
> exceeded. And it propbably was used for things that it better had
This assumes the kernel is moni
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009, Marc Balmer wrote:
I was looking for the same info a time ago .. something that would allow me
to gather all the info from the same place, but the only thing I came up
with was the very same discussion about the sensors framework port and
nothing else.
Any info on any su
Am 22.08.2009 um 08:03 schrieb Gonzalo Nemmi:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 11:17 PM, Oliver Pinter
wrote:
Hello!
When I good know, no common interface exisit in current freebsd
kernel, but some other sysctl interfece exisit: coretemp, aiboost ...
~> sysctl dev.coretemp
dev.coretemp.0.%desc: CP
Aurélien Méré wrote:
Hi,
I've been using FreeBSD for years in all my servers, but I'm facing a big
problem today. All servers are under monitoring using a couple of
applications and scripts. Monitored items for each server especially are
CPU/mobo/UPS/HDD temperatures, CPU load, memory use,
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 11:17 PM, Oliver Pinter wrote:
> Hello!
>
> When I good know, no common interface exisit in current freebsd
> kernel, but some other sysctl interfece exisit: coretemp, aiboost ...
>
> ~> sysctl dev.coretemp
> dev.coretemp.0.%desc: CPU On-Die Thermal Sensors
> dev.coretemp.
Hello!
When I good know, no common interface exisit in current freebsd
kernel, but some other sysctl interfece exisit: coretemp, aiboost ...
~> sysctl dev.coretemp
dev.coretemp.0.%desc: CPU On-Die Thermal Sensors
dev.coretemp.0.%driver: coretemp
dev.coretemp.0.%parent: cpu0
dev.coretemp.1.%desc:
Hi,
I've been using FreeBSD for years in all my servers, but I'm facing a big
problem today. All servers are under monitoring using a couple of
applications and scripts. Monitored items for each server especially are
CPU/mobo/UPS/HDD temperatures, CPU load, memory use, fans speed, PSU/UPS
volt
22 matches
Mail list logo
