On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Tony Frank wrote:
[snip]
TF> > > : If "True", for optimized code across all machines, the code should
TF> > > : just be built on each machine, right?
TF> > > That would give slightly better performance. However, it can be more
TF> > > pain than it is worth if the number of m
On Feb 23, at 09:12 AM, M. Warner Losh wrote:
>
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> D J Hawkey Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : True or False: Setting CPUTYPE to the lowest target CPU ("p2") in
> : a build machine's make.conf will cripple the performance of target
> : machines with h
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 10:46:07AM -0600, D J Hawkey Jr wrote:
> On Feb 23, at 09:12 AM, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> >
> > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > D J Hawkey Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > : True or False: Setting CPUTYPE to the lowest target CPU ("p2") in
> > : a buil
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
D J Hawkey Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: True or False: Setting CPUTYPE to the lowest target CPU ("p2") in
: a build machine's make.conf will cripple the performance of target
: machines with higher CPUs ("p3", "p4", "i586", "i686", etc.).
False. It
OK, I've cross-posted this message to -hackers, to see if we can get
some sort of definitive [to me] answer. Please forgive if it's considered
bad form.
-hackers: There is a thread in -questions in response to my query as
to building the world and kernels for a variety of Intel CPUs on one
machine
5 matches
Mail list logo
