On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 8:08 AM, Bill Crisp wrote:
> I gave it a try on a few servers, and saw a big increase in load on
> the servers, most of the load comes from apache under normal
> circumstances and it that load did go up a lot. I had to roll back
> the patched kernel and the load went back
Thanks for the patch!
I gave it a try on a few servers, and saw a big increase in load on the
servers, most of the load comes from apache under normal circumstances and
it that load did go up a lot. I had to roll back the patched kernel and
the load went back to what it normally is. Did you expe
On Wednesday, July 18, 2012 4:59:21 pm James wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Bill Crisp
wrote:
> >
> > Unfortunately I tried to put the code from the patch in place but there
> > seems to be some missing functions in the header file and too many
> > arguments to a function and some othe
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Bill Crisp wrote:
>
> Unfortunately I tried to put the code from the patch in place but there
> seems to be some missing functions in the header file and too many
> arguments to a function and some other errors below:
Hi Bill. Yes, the patch for >= FreeBSD 7 w
Xin,
Thanks for the reply!
Unfortunately I tried to put the code from the patch in place but there
seems to be some missing functions in the header file and too many
arguments to a function and some other errors below:
../../../amd64/amd64/trap.c: In function `syscall':
../../../amd64/amd64/trap
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 11:02 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Friday, July 13, 2012 10:42:04 am Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> In message <201207130831.59211@freebsd.org>, John Baldwin writes:
>>
>> >Every FreeBSD/amd64 kernel in existent is vulnerable. In truth, my
> personal
>> >opinion is t
In message <201207130831.59211@freebsd.org>, John Baldwin writes:
>Every FreeBSD/amd64 kernel in existent is vulnerable. In truth, my personal
>opinion is that Intel screwed up their implementation of that instruction
>whereas AMD got it right, and we are merely working around Intel's CPU b
On Friday, July 13, 2012 10:42:04 am Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <201207130831.59211@freebsd.org>, John Baldwin writes:
>
> >Every FreeBSD/amd64 kernel in existent is vulnerable. In truth, my
personal
> >opinion is that Intel screwed up their implementation of that instruction
>
On Thursday, July 12, 2012 12:36:07 pm Bill Crisp wrote:
> Good Morning!
>
> This was also posted to the FreeBSD forums:
>
> I have been researching CVE-2012-0217 and while I have patched the kernels
> on servers with 7.3/8.2 that I have, I would like to see if anyone knows
> for sure if 6.2/6.3
On 07/12/12 09:36, Bill Crisp wrote:
Good Morning!
This was also posted to the FreeBSD forums:
I have been researching CVE-2012-0217 and while I have patched the kernels
on servers with 7.3/8.2 that I have, I would like to see if anyone knows
for sure if 6.2/6.3 are also vulnerable? I am aware
Good Morning!
This was also posted to the FreeBSD forums:
I have been researching CVE-2012-0217 and while I have patched the kernels
on servers with 7.3/8.2 that I have, I would like to see if anyone knows
for sure if 6.2/6.3 are also vulnerable? I am aware that those kernels are
out of support f
11 matches
Mail list logo
