> On Sun, Oct 08, 2000 at 12:53:16AM -0700, a little birdie told me
> that Dima Dorfman remarked
> >
> > Why not just use a date? I do this on most of my systems. My `uname
> > -r` reads:
> >
> > 4.1-2916-STABLE
> >
> > I started doing this for the exact same reason you described above--t
On Sun, Oct 08, 2000 at 12:53:16AM -0700, a little birdie told me
that Dima Dorfman remarked
>
> Why not just use a date? I do this on most of my systems. My `uname
> -r` reads:
>
> 4.1-2916-STABLE
>
> I started doing this for the exact same reason you described above--to
> know when I up
> The whole "Stable Branch" thread on -security gave me an idea that's been
> perculating for some time.
>
> Problem:
> We have security problems in (say) -STABLE. They get fixed. We post an
> advisory about it, giving correction dates for -STABLE and -CURRENT, and
> the associated cutoff in w
The whole "Stable Branch" thread on -security gave me an idea that's been
perculating for some time.
Problem:
We have security problems in (say) -STABLE. They get fixed. We post an
advisory about it, giving correction dates for -STABLE and -CURRENT, and
the associated cutoff in which releases
4 matches
Mail list logo
