Re: Bug by design in getfsfile(3) / needed sanity check for mountpoints

2008-06-16 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 2:27 AM, Garrett Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok it appears I wasn't intelligent enough to post this in the right > place last night. Comments please? > > Hi hackers, > > I have a question, pending a bug found in getfsfile(3) [1]. > > Is there any possib

Bug by design in getfsfile(3) / needed sanity check for mountpoints

2008-06-10 Thread Garrett Cooper
Ok it appears I wasn't intelligent enough to post this in the right place last night. Comments please? Hi hackers, I have a question, pending a bug found in getfsfile(3) [1]. Is there any possibility where a mountpoint be any value other than a directory, a symlink, or "none", i.

Re: Bug by design in getfsfile(3) / needed sanity check for mountpoints

2008-06-09 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 03:53:41 +0300, Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 9 Jun 2008 01:34:19 -0700, "Garrett Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi hackers, >> I have a question, pending a bug found in getfsfile(3) [1]. >> Is there any possibility where a mountpoint

Re: Bug by design in getfsfile(3) / needed sanity check for mountpoints

2008-06-09 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On Mon, 9 Jun 2008 01:34:19 -0700, "Garrett Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi hackers, > I have a question, pending a bug found in getfsfile(3) [1]. > Is there any possibility where a mountpoint be any value other > than a directory, a symlink, or "none", i.e. a flat file? > Thank

Bug by design in getfsfile(3) / needed sanity check for mountpoints

2008-06-09 Thread Garrett Cooper
Hi hackers, I have a question, pending a bug found in getfsfile(3) [1]. Is there any possibility where a mountpoint be any value other than a directory, a symlink, or "none", i.e. a flat file? Thanks, -Garrett References: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/124409 (not fully