Re: BSD dlopen and such

2001-01-07 Thread Pascal Hofstee
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 10:19:56AM -0800, Doug White wrote: > No. The linux compatbility is through the image activator. The syscalls > have to be translated, otherwise if you were running as root and loaded a > linux lib into a freebsd binary, then that lib called fcntl(), your system > would r

Re: BSD dlopen and such

2001-01-05 Thread David O'Brien
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 10:19:56AM -0800, Doug White wrote: > > 1) Can a native binary dlopen a Linux ELF GL, yes or no? > > No. The linux compatbility is through the image activator. The syscalls > have to be translated, otherwise if you were running as root and loaded a > linux lib into a fre

Re: BSD dlopen and such

2001-01-04 Thread Doug White
On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Rafael Barrero wrote: > Hi all, > > Two questions: > > 0) Are native binaries for OpenBSD different from FreeBSD? Yes. > 1) Can a native binary dlopen a Linux ELF GL, yes or no? No. The linux compatbility is through the image activator. The syscalls have to be translat

Re: BSD dlopen and such

2001-01-02 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Rafael Barrero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 0) Are native binaries for OpenBSD different from FreeBSD? Yes. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the mess

BSD dlopen and such

2001-01-02 Thread Rafael Barrero
Hi all, Two questions: 0) Are native binaries for OpenBSD different from FreeBSD? 1) Can a native binary dlopen a Linux ELF GL, yes or no? Rafael Barrero [EMAIL PROTECTED] "You know ... you take the killing for granted. And then it's gone, and you're like, 'I wish I'd appreciated it more.' S