Re: BSD VS BDS

2000-03-30 Thread Martin Cracauer
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Holloway wrote: > Oh I completely disagree. > Many serious orgnanizations and people concerned > with stability work with 3.x and plan on sticking with > 3.x until many of the serious changes to 4.0 have proven > themselves. > > The gcc (2.9.x -- 3.x) compiler for e

Re: BSD VS BDS

2000-03-30 Thread David Holloway
Oh I completely disagree. Many serious orgnanizations and people concerned with stability work with 3.x and plan on sticking with 3.x until many of the serious changes to 4.0 have proven themselves. The gcc (2.9.x -- 3.x) compiler for example, has only just recently become as rock solid as the st

Re: BSD VS BDS

2000-03-30 Thread Martin Cracauer
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, p_a_r wrote: > Ok but i downloaded the 3.3-stable is there some problems whit that > and whats so good in the new 4.0?? Oh no, not again. 3.3 is not "bad", but I would recommend updating to 4.0/4.1 instead of 3.4/3.5 when the time comes. Higher 3.x releases - in my opi

Re: BSD VS BDS

2000-03-30 Thread p_a_r
Ok but i downloaded the 3.3-stable is there some problems whit that and whats so good in the new 4.0?? Martin Cracauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tuesday March 28, 2000 at 12:52pm: >In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, p_a_r wrote: >> >> Can anyone tell me the differens in FreeBSD and NetBSD. I would

Re: BSD VS BDS

2000-03-28 Thread Martin Cracauer
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, p_a_r wrote: > > Can anyone tell me the differens in FreeBSD and NetBSD. I would like > to set up 2 internet servers whitch one should i take? As long as you can't tell by yourself, you are usually better off with FreeBSD, since it is easier to install and has more reso

Re: BSD VS BDS

2000-03-28 Thread Jesper Skriver
On Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 12:11:28AM -0800, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 09:39:11AM +0200, Konrad Heuer wrote: > > > > The most important strength of NetBSD is its availability on many > > different hardware platforms. If you plan to set up your servers on Intel > > or DECalpha sof

Re: BSD VS BDS

2000-03-28 Thread Brooks Davis
On Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 09:39:11AM +0200, Konrad Heuer wrote: > > The most important strength of NetBSD is its availability on many > different hardware platforms. If you plan to set up your servers on Intel > or DECalpha software, FreeBSD might do better for you. For example, > FreeBSD supports

Re: BSD VS BDS

2000-03-27 Thread Konrad Heuer
On Mon, 27 Mar 2000, p_a_r wrote: > Can anyone tell me the differens in FreeBSD and NetBSD. I would like > to set up 2 internet servers whitch one should i take? Well, there's some risk to answer the question - someone may feel his/her favourite os to be treated inadequately. The most importa

BSD VS BDS

2000-03-27 Thread p_a_r
Can anyone tell me the differens in FreeBSD and NetBSD. I would like to set up 2 internet servers whitch one should i take? Lars Beinhoff +--+ | The coolest site for free home pages, email, chat, e-cards, movie info.. | |