Re: Arg! Siginfo and pthreads again

2000-12-03 Thread Peter Dufault
> On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, Peter Dufault wrote: > > Again I've forgotten that SIGINFO dumps the pthread info and created > > several gigabytes of /tmp files: > > > > > rt% rm /tmp/uthread* > > > /bin/rm: Argument list too long. > > > > I don't consider it bad form to use SIGINFO to see if processes a

Re: Arg! Siginfo and pthreads again

2000-12-03 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, Peter Dufault wrote: > Again I've forgotten that SIGINFO dumps the pthread info and created > several gigabytes of /tmp files: > > > rt% rm /tmp/uthread* > > /bin/rm: Argument list too long. > > I don't consider it bad form to use SIGINFO to see if processes are > still aroun

Arg! Siginfo and pthreads again

2000-12-03 Thread Peter Dufault
Again I've forgotten that SIGINFO dumps the pthread info and created several gigabytes of /tmp files: > rt% rm /tmp/uthread* > /bin/rm: Argument list too long. I don't consider it bad form to use SIGINFO to see if processes are still around without first installing a SIGINFO handler. Am I the o