Ed Maste wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 11:38:40AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
Ed Maste wrote:
Ahh, it seems ups' commit of rmlocks changed the "You have: sx_lock,
You want: Slp_mtx" case from no to ok (in r173444).
Ignore me.. I was reading the table backwards.. of course if you have
an sx
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 11:38:40AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> >Ed Maste wrote:
> >>Ahh, it seems ups' commit of rmlocks changed the "You have: sx_lock,
> >>You want: Slp_mtx" case from no to ok (in r173444).
>
> Ignore me.. I was reading the table backwards.. of course if you have
> an sx y
Julian Elischer wrote:
Ed Maste wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 12:02:56PM -0400, Ryan Stone wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Monday 18 August 2008 17:14:01 Ryan Stone wrote:
Are there any problems acquiring a sleep mutex after acquiring an sx
Ed Maste wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 12:02:56PM -0400, Ryan Stone wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Monday 18 August 2008 17:14:01 Ryan Stone wrote:
Are there any problems acquiring a sleep mutex after acquiring an sx
lock?
man 9 locking sa
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 12:02:56PM -0400, Ryan Stone wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Monday 18 August 2008 17:14:01 Ryan Stone wrote:
> > > Are there any problems acquiring a sleep mutex after acquiring an sx
> > lock?
> > > man 9 locking s
I guess the FreeBSD 8 man pages have been fixed but the FreeBSD 7 ones
haven't. This is what I was looking at:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=locking&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=FreeBSD+7.0-RELEASE&format=html
Thanks for the response,
Ryan Stone
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Max L
On Monday 18 August 2008 17:14:01 Ryan Stone wrote:
> Are there any problems acquiring a sleep mutex after acquiring an sx lock?
> man 9 locking says that you can't, but doesn't provide any reasons.
> Obviously while you're holding the mutex you have to abide by the rules
> applying to mutexes, but
Are there any problems acquiring a sleep mutex after acquiring an sx lock?
man 9 locking says that you can't, but doesn't provide any reasons.
Obviously while you're holding the mutex you have to abide by the rules
applying to mutexes, but as long as you do that, I can't see why acquiring a
mutex a
8 matches
Mail list logo