Bruce Evans wrote:
On Sun, 11 Apr 2004, Roman Kurakin wrote:
I remind you that now I have two problems. First one that FreeBSD uses
wrong assumption about which device should be CHS and which LBA:
if (!ad_version(atadev->param->version_major) ||
!(atadev->param->atavalid & ATA_FLAG_54_58) || !l
On Sun, 11 Apr 2004, Roman Kurakin wrote:
> I remind you that now I have two problems. First one that FreeBSD uses
> wrong assumption about which device should be CHS and which LBA:
>
> if (!ad_version(atadev->param->version_major) ||
> !(atadev->param->atavalid & ATA_FLAG_54_58) || !lbasize)
> at
Hi,
You can find history of my previous postings below.
I didn't moved far since that time, because lack of time. But any way
I have some new information and one patch I want to share. This patch
didn't solve any of my problems.
Soren, please review it. This time it is comlete. I hope this
patch
S?ren Schmidt wrote:
Roman Kurakin wrote:
This is not an LBA request. ATA driver thinks that I have 80G CHS
device, cause it's ATA_FLAG_54_58
is zero. (This decision is incorrect, we shouldn't relay on this
flag). I've checked another seagate 80G drive in
CHS mode(by driver hacking), and prob
Roman Kurakin wrote:
This is not an LBA request. ATA driver thinks that I have 80G CHS
device, cause it's ATA_FLAG_54_58
is zero. (This decision is incorrect, we shouldn't relay on this flag).
I've checked another seagate 80G drive in
CHS mode(by driver hacking), and problematic one with LBA mod
Hi,
(Was "HDD question" on hackers@, posted also here cause this is also
CURRENT problem)
History:
>I have some problems with my HDD (ST380021A). The problem was
checked on 5.2, 5.2.1, and some
> 5.Current (cvsuped about week or two).
>
>At first I got this problem while system insta
6 matches
Mail list logo