Re: ASUS P4P800-VM + AD1980 (Was Re: VIA8235 + AD1980)

2003-11-02 Thread Wilko Bulte
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 04:32:30PM -0700, Orion Hodson wrote: > /-- Wilko Bulte wrote: > | > | hi, sorry for jumping in late: what is/is not now in 4.8-stable > | as far as the patches go to make the Asus P4P800 work? > | > | I get as far as: > | > | [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~: dmesg| grep pcm > | pcm0

Re: ASUS P4P800-VM + AD1980 (Was Re: VIA8235 + AD1980)

2003-08-20 Thread Wilko Bulte
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 11:52:28AM +0200, Rudolf Cejka wrote: > Wilko Bulte wrote (2003/08/20): > > On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 07:09:40AM -0700, Orion Hodson wrote: > > > Rather than "defensively" assign the input monitor control > > > (SOUND_MIXER_MONITOR) to an output, it'd be better to use a separ

Re: ASUS P4P800-VM + AD1980 (Was Re: VIA8235 + AD1980)

2003-08-20 Thread Rudolf Cejka
Wilko Bulte wrote (2003/08/20): > On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 07:09:40AM -0700, Orion Hodson wrote: > > Rather than "defensively" assign the input monitor control > > (SOUND_MIXER_MONITOR) to an output, it'd be better to use a separate output > > control, eg add a control for SOUND_MIXER_OGAIN, shoul

Re: ASUS P4P800-VM + AD1980 (Was Re: VIA8235 + AD1980)

2003-08-19 Thread Orion Hodson
/-- Wilko Bulte wrote: | | hi, sorry for jumping in late: what is/is not now in 4.8-stable | as far as the patches go to make the Asus P4P800 work? | | I get as far as: | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~: dmesg| grep pcm | pcm0: port 0xee80-0xeebf,0xe800-0xe8ff mem | 0xfebff400-0xfebff4ff,0xfebff800-0xfeb

Re: ASUS P4P800-VM + AD1980 (Was Re: VIA8235 + AD1980)

2003-08-19 Thread Wilko Bulte
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 07:09:40AM -0700, Orion Hodson wrote: > /-- Rudolf Cejka wrote: > | Rudolf Cejka wrote (2003/08/18): > | > my "another machine" is at home, so I will be sure about your patch > | > tomorrow and I will send you another mail, however it looks reasonably. > | > Maybe just for

Re: ASUS P4P800-VM + AD1980 (Was Re: VIA8235 + AD1980)

2003-08-19 Thread Orion Hodson
/-- Rudolf Cejka wrote: | Rudolf Cejka wrote (2003/08/18): | > my "another machine" is at home, so I will be sure about your patch | > tomorrow and I will send you another mail, however it looks reasonably. | > Maybe just for "defensive programming" wouldn't it be "safer" to switch | > values ins

Re: ASUS P4P800-VM + AD1980 (Was Re: VIA8235 + AD1980)

2003-08-19 Thread Rudolf Cejka
Rudolf Cejka wrote (2003/08/18): > my "another machine" is at home, so I will be sure about your patch > tomorrow and I will send you another mail, however it looks reasonably. > Maybe just for "defensive programming" wouldn't it be "safer" to switch > values instead of assignment? Maybe there ar

Re: ASUS P4P800-VM + AD1980 (Was Re: VIA8235 + AD1980)

2003-08-18 Thread Rudolf Cejka
Orion Hodson wrote (2003/08/17): > There's a patch below that should help with this case - let > me know how you go as I have no similar h/w. Hello, my "another machine" is at home, so I will be sure about your patch tomorrow and I will send you another mail, however it looks reasonably. Maybe j

Re: ASUS P4P800-VM + AD1980 (Was Re: VIA8235 + AD1980)

2003-08-17 Thread Orion Hodson
/-- Rudolf Cejka wrote: | Orion Hodson wrote (2003/06/26): | > Oleg, Well done on working out a working fix for this problem... | > ... There are some comments inline below that may help. | > - Orion | | Hello, | how did you solve it in the end? Recently, I have got my new | machine with ASUS

ASUS P4P800-VM + AD1980 (Was Re: VIA8235 + AD1980)

2003-08-15 Thread Rudolf Cejka
Orion Hodson wrote (2003/06/26): > Oleg, Well done on working out a working fix for this problem... > ... There are some comments inline below that may help. > - Orion Hello, how did you solve it in the end? Recently, I have got my new machine with ASUS P4P800-VM with AD1980 and I came into ex