Re: ALT- (Was: how to make 'for' understand two words as a single argumen)

2001-10-03 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
Greg Shenaut wrote: > > Right. Easiest is not necessarily best, in this case for exactly > your reason. If you want a space in a filename, the Unix tradition > clearly favors your having one. > > But you have to admit, space is a character that has caused many > problems in Unix filenames, bec

Re: ALT- (Was: how to make 'for' understand two words as a single argumen)

2001-10-02 Thread Mike Meyer
Greg Shenaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> types: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, void cleopede: > >On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 07:19:37AM -0700, Greg Shenaut wrote: > >> Is there any reason why the "unbreakable space" (0xa0) shouldn't be > >> the only kind of space character used/allowed in filenames? > >Any

Re: ALT- (Was: how to make 'for' understand two words as a single argumen)

2001-10-02 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Greg Shenaut writes: : But you have to admit, space is a character that has caused many : problems in Unix filenames, because of the other Unix tradition of : space-delimited word record handling. I usually use an underscore, : myself, if I want a space-like separat

Re: ALT- (Was: how to make 'for' understand two words as a single argumen)

2001-10-02 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Giorgos Keramidas writes: : Greg Shenaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: : > : > I just throw out the idea--as for where to enforce such a convention, : > I agree that the file-system definition may not be the best place, : > but it might be the *easiest* place (spaces c

Re: ALT- (Was: how to make 'for' understand two words as a single argumen)

2001-10-02 Thread Greg Shenaut
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Giorgos Keramidas cleopede: >Greg Shenaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Just out of curiosity, what would be an instance where you have >> wanted a space in a filename and wouldn't have been satisfied with >> 0xa0 instead of 0x20? > >All of them. Space is so co

Re: ALT- (Was: how to make 'for' understand two words as a single argumen)

2001-10-02 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
Greg Shenaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Just out of curiosity, what would be an instance where you have > wanted a space in a filename and wouldn't have been satisfied with > 0xa0 instead of 0x20? All of them. Space is so conveniently placed under the tip of my thumb. To type 0xa0 I would h

Re: ALT- (Was: how to make 'for' understand two words as a single argumen)

2001-10-02 Thread Greg Shenaut
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Giorgos Keramidas cleopede: >Greg Shenaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> I just throw out the idea--as for where to enforce such a convention, >> I agree that the file-system definition may not be the best place, >> but it might be the *easiest* place (spaces cou

Re: ALT- (Was: how to make 'for' understand two words as a single argumen)

2001-10-02 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
Greg Shenaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I just throw out the idea--as for where to enforce such a convention, > I agree that the file-system definition may not be the best place, > but it might be the *easiest* place (spaces could be silently mapped > to 0xa0's). Please don't even think abou

Re: ALT- (Was: how to make 'for' understand two words as a single argumen)

2001-10-02 Thread Greg Shenaut
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, void cleopede: >On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 07:19:37AM -0700, Greg Shenaut wrote: >> >> Is there any reason why the "unbreakable space" (0xa0) shouldn't be >> the only kind of space character used/allowed in filenames? > >Any character except for '/' is allowed in file

Re: ALT- (Was: how to make 'for' understand two words as a single argumen)

2001-10-02 Thread void
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 07:19:37AM -0700, Greg Shenaut wrote: > > Is there any reason why the "unbreakable space" (0xa0) shouldn't be > the only kind of space character used/allowed in filenames? Any character except for '/' is allowed in filenames, and I believe it's been that way since the daw

ALT- (Was: how to make 'for' understand two words as a single argumen)

2001-10-02 Thread Greg Shenaut
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Daniel C. Sobral" cleopede: >Stijn Hoop wrote: >> >> > Any way using `` won't work. for i in a "b c" d works, for instance, but >> > there is not way that I know of that you can control the output this way >> > using ``. >> >> Yes there is: set IFS to only contai