Re: ACPI: working ACPI vs broken ACPI

2003-02-16 Thread Hiten Pandya
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 08:27:45PM -0600, Mike Silbersack wrote the words in effect of: > > On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, Martin Blapp wrote: > > > Feb 13 17:41:05 ibm-01 kernel: ACPI-0625: *** Info: GPE Block0 defined as GPE0 > > to GPE31 > > Feb 13 17:41:05 ibm-01 kernel: ACPI-0625: *** Info: GPE Block1

Re: ACPI: working ACPI vs broken ACPI

2003-02-15 Thread Mike Silbersack
On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, Martin Blapp wrote: > Feb 13 17:41:05 ibm-01 kernel: ACPI-0625: *** Info: GPE Block0 defined as GPE0 > to GPE31 > Feb 13 17:41:05 ibm-01 kernel: ACPI-0625: *** Info: GPE Block1 defined as GPE32 > to GPE63 I see similar errors on my Presario 2100US... > Wild guess: Seem to r

ACPI: working ACPI vs broken ACPI

2003-02-15 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi all, I see these differences here in acpidump: Working board: PM2_GPE0_BLK=0xe428-0xe42f Broken board: PM2_GPE0_BLK=0x428-0x42f PM2_GPE1_BLK=0x528-0x52f, GPE1_BASE=32 And the broken board shows errors like this: The errors like: Feb 13 17:41:05 ibm-01 kernel: ACP