Joe Schmoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Joe Schmoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > 1. Is it dangerous to mount all 20 possible
> > > filesystem snapshots and
> > > _leave them mounted_ to use at any time ?
> >
> > I don't think there is any dang
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004, Joe Schmoe wrote:
> --- Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > 1. Is it dangerous to mount all 20 possible
> > filesystem snapshots and
> > > _leave them mounted_ to use at any time ?
> >
> > I don't think there is any danger, except that you
> > will run
> > ou
--- Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 1. Is it dangerous to mount all 20 possible
> filesystem snapshots and
> > _leave them mounted_ to use at any time ?
>
> I don't think there is any danger, except that you
> will run
> out of disk space sooner or later.
Every snapshot I have ta
Joe Schmoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi - a few questions about UFS2 and snapshots:
I'm not a kernel guru, but just a user like you, so take my
answers with a pinch of salt ...
> 1. Is it dangerous to mount all 20 possible filesystem snapshots and
> _leave them mounted_ to use at any time ?
(posted to -questions a few days back, but with no response)
Hi - a few questions about UFS2 and snapshots:
1. Is it dangerous to mount all 20 possible filesystem snapshots and _leave them
mounted_ to use at any time ? What about
automatically mounting all 20 snapshots at boot time ?
2. Rela
5 matches
Mail list logo
