Re: A bit confused with the sched_4bsd.c code

2005-05-06 Thread Divacky Roman
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 09:39:21AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > >Halil Demirezen wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> First of all, I am not sure if this is the correct mail list with posting > >this > >> mail. I apologize for that.. Second, I may seem to have little > >> C knowledge, though

Re: A bit confused with the sched_4bsd.c code

2005-05-06 Thread gerarra
>Halil Demirezen wrote: >> Hello, >> >> First of all, I am not sure if this is the correct mail list with posting >this >> mail. I apologize for that.. Second, I may seem to have little >> C knowledge, though I am using C for about 5 years and plus. >> >> Let's start with the question. I am diggi

Re: A bit confused with the sched_4bsd.c code

2005-05-05 Thread Stephan Uphoff
On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 20:10, Halil Demirezen wrote: > Hello, > > First of all, I am not sure if this is the correct mail list with posting > this > mail. I apologize for that.. Second, I may seem to have little > C knowledge, though I am using C for about 5 years and plus. > > Let's start with

Re: A bit confused with the sched_4bsd.c code

2005-05-05 Thread Julian Elischer
Halil Demirezen wrote: Hello, First of all, I am not sure if this is the correct mail list with posting this mail. I apologize for that.. Second, I may seem to have little C knowledge, though I am using C for about 5 years and plus. Let's start with the question. I am digging the FreeBSD-5.3 ke

Re: A bit confused with the sched_4bsd.c code

2005-05-05 Thread Julian Elischer
Scott Long wrote: Halil Demirezen wrote: Hello, First of all, I am not sure if this is the correct mail list with posting this mail. I apologize for that.. Second, I may seem to have little C knowledge, though I am using C for about 5 years and plus. Let's start with the question. I am digging

Re: A bit confused with the sched_4bsd.c code

2005-05-05 Thread Scott Long
Halil Demirezen wrote: On Thursday 05 May 2005 21:48, Scott Long wrote: #define td_kse td_sched Yes that is also a magical case since in the sys/proc.h file, only a single definition lies; struct td_sched; That's called a forward declaration. I could not understand anything from this. There is not

Re: A bit confused with the sched_4bsd.c code

2005-05-05 Thread Halil Demirezen
On Thursday 05 May 2005 21:48, Scott Long wrote: > #define td_kse td_sched Yes that is also a magical case since in the sys/proc.h file, only a single definition lies; struct td_sched; I could not understand anything from this. There is not body of the structure. Shouldn't there be a definitive

Re: A bit confused with the sched_4bsd.c code

2005-05-05 Thread Scott Long
Halil Demirezen wrote: Hello, First of all, I am not sure if this is the correct mail list with posting this mail. I apologize for that.. Second, I may seem to have little C knowledge, though I am using C for about 5 years and plus. Let's start with the question. I am digging the FreeBSD-5.3 ker

A bit confused with the sched_4bsd.c code

2005-05-05 Thread Halil Demirezen
Hello, First of all, I am not sure if this is the correct mail list with posting this mail. I apologize for that.. Second, I may seem to have little C knowledge, though I am using C for about 5 years and plus. Let's start with the question. I am digging the FreeBSD-5.3 kernel codes. Watson's Cr