>Would be interesting if CURRENT does panic too ...
Well, it does. Tested on -CURRENT supped today at about ~1 EST.
The panic message is different this time: panic: m_free detected a mbuf
double-free.
Still, I couldn't reproduce it after swapping NICs.
Later,
__
>From: David Rhodus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Cc: Martin Blapp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: 4.8-stable kernel panic
Yes, I don't think this email will make it to hackers@ because all the
email fro
Hi,
> #!/bin/bash
> while :; do
> ping -f -s 65467 ip_addr &
> done
So probably mbuf exhaustion.
>
> Here's the NIC info:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:9:0: class=0x02 card=0x00ed16ec chip=0x12161113 rev=0x11
> hdr=0x00
> vendor = 'Accton Technology Corporation'
> device = 'EN5251-Base
>
> Hi,
>
>> #0 dumpsys () at ../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:487
>> #1 0xc0168237 in boot (howto=256) at ../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:316
>> #2 0xc0168675 in panic (fmt=0xc02db260 "m_copydata, offset > size of
>> mbuf
>> chain") at ../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:595
>> #3 0xc018576e in m_copydata (m=0xc1
Hi,
> #0 dumpsys () at ../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:487
> #1 0xc0168237 in boot (howto=256) at ../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:316
> #2 0xc0168675 in panic (fmt=0xc02db260 "m_copydata, offset > size of mbuf
> chain") at ../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:595
> #3 0xc018576e in m_copydata (m=0xc1560d00, off=
> Do you use any klds? What does kldstat say?
No klds loaded.
Well, it looks like the dc net driver is causing the panic. After some
testing, I got this backtrace:
---
#0 dumpsys () at ../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:487
#1 0xc0168237 in boot (howto=256) at ../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:316
#2 0xc0168
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, 18:55-0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It appears that pr-55886 is entirely different bug. After applying the
> above patch, I can still get a kernel panic due to mbufs exhaustion.
>
> Mike "Silby" Silbersack wrote:
> > 1. Can you compile INVARIANTS and INVARIANT_SUPPORT into
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Robert Watson wrote:
> If one of you has had a chance to test this properly, please go ahead and
> commit. I don't have remote -STABLE development boxes, so haven't been
> able to do any -STABLE merging since I went to BSDCon. I did get RE
> permission to MFC this change.
>
It appears that pr-55886 is entirely different bug. After applying the
above patch, I can still get a kernel panic due to mbufs exhaustion.
Mike "Silby" Silbersack wrote:
> 1. Can you compile INVARIANTS and INVARIANT_SUPPORT into your kernel?
After compiling INVARIANTS* into the kernel, here's w
If one of you has had a chance to test this properly, please go ahead and
commit. I don't have remote -STABLE development boxes, so haven't been
able to do any -STABLE merging since I went to BSDCon. I did get RE
permission to MFC this change.
FYI, I have a bunch more related changes in a patch
On Sun, 14 Sep 2003, 23:05-0500, Mike Silbersack wrote:
>
> On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > It's been almost a month now since I posted the original message on the
> > list and I'm wondering about the progress on resolving this problem.
> >
> > I still can reprodu
On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It's been almost a month now since I posted the original message on the
> list and I'm wondering about the progress on resolving this problem.
>
> I still can reproduce the panics after cvs-supping to RELENG_4 ~ 23:00 EDT
> today.
>
> Than
and the problem is/was?
On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It's been almost a month now since I posted the original message on the
> list and I'm wondering about the progress on resolving this problem.
>
> I still can reproduce the panics after cvs-supping to RELENG_4 ~ 2
Hello,
It's been almost a month now since I posted the original message on the
list and I'm wondering about the progress on resolving this problem.
I still can reproduce the panics after cvs-supping to RELENG_4 ~ 23:00 EDT
today.
Thanks much.
___
[EMAI
> What version of uipc_mbuf.c and mbuf.h are present on your system?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mike "Silby" Silbersack
uipc_mbuf.c:
$FreeBSD: src/sys/kern/uipc_mbuf.c,v 1.51.2.32 2003/08/10 21:51:41 silby
Exp $
mbuf.h:
$FreeBSD: src/sys/sys/mbuf.h,v 1.44.2.21 2003/08/10 21:51:41 silby Exp $
Thanks,
Hi,
It appears that the kernel panics at the time of high network activity. I
was ble to reproduce it on my machine using this shell script:
-- cut here --
#!/bin/sh
# test IPAddr
IPADDR=192.168.0.254
while :; do
ping -f -s 65467 IPADDR &
ping -f -s 65467 IPADDR &
done
-- cut here --
Basicly t
16 matches
Mail list logo
