> Would you ever want "miibus" even if you're NOT using any of
> the cards that require it?
>
> I guess you might need it to be able to KLD load one of those
> drivers.. ? But that's no argument becuse you could just have
> a miibus.ko that was a dependency of those drivers.
>
> So why is it a s
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Archie Cobbs writes:
: Warner Losh writes:
: > : So why is it a separate option?
: >
: > because it is a driver. Why is pci a separate driver? While most
: > computers have it, not all do. Likewise with miibus.
:
: Ah.. but this analogy is not exact, because (fo
Archie Cobbs writes:
> But you're probably right, since it's a driver maybe that's
> a good enough reason. ^^
Oops, meant "bus" instead of "driver" there..
-Archie
___
Archie Cobbs * Whistle Commun
Warner Losh writes:
> : So why is it a separate option?
>
> because it is a driver. Why is pci a separate driver? While most
> computers have it, not all do. Likewise with miibus.
Ah.. but this analogy is not exact, because (for example)
"device ed0" does not require PCI, wheras all of these
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Archie Cobbs writes:
: Warner Losh writes:
: > : not marked. I noticed that 4.1 Release miibus is still not
: > : marked as (required), is it no longer required, or is it still
: > : not marked? I ahven't tried compiling it with miibus comm
Warner Losh writes:
> : not marked. I noticed that 4.1 Release miibus is still not
> : marked as (required), is it no longer required, or is it still
> : not marked? I ahven't tried compiling it with miibus commented
> : out, I'm just assuming it's still required
&g
In message <000901c00d15$014ef540$020a@development1> "Daryl Chance" writes:
: I know that in 4.0 Release that miibus was required, though
: not marked. I noticed that 4.1 Release miibus is still not
: marked as (required), is it no longer required, or is it still
: not ma
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2000 10:30 AM
Subject: Re: 4.1 ReleaseMIIBUS
> On Wed, 23 Aug 2000, Daryl Chance wrote:
>
> :Hi,
> :
> :I know that in 4.0 Release that miibus was required, though
> :not marked. I noticed that 4.1 Release miibus is stil
On Wed, 23 Aug 2000, Daryl Chance wrote:
:Hi,
:
:I know that in 4.0 Release that miibus was required, though
:not marked. I noticed that 4.1 Release miibus is still not
:marked as (required), is it no longer required, or is it still
:not marked? I ahven't tried compiling it with m
Hi,
I know that in 4.0 Release that miibus was required, though
not marked. I noticed that 4.1 Release miibus is still not
marked as (required), is it no longer required, or is it still
not marked? I ahven't tried compiling it with miibus commented
out, I'm just assuming it's
10 matches
Mail list logo
