On Wed, Aug 09, 2000 at 12:35:11PM +0200, Mitja Horvat wrote:
>
> As I understand SU, it's just a method to do metadata asynchronously in a
> safe way,
> so using noasync with SU does still have a point?
"Using noasync" is a no-op; noasync is the default.
--
Ben
220 go.ahead.make.my.day ES
Hi,
>
> There's no reason to use softupdates and async together. SU gets you
> the same benefits, but much more safely.
You are right... I thought async was only for data updates, not metadata
too...
Thanks for clearing this out...
As I understand SU, it's just a method to do metadata asy
On Tue, Aug 08, 2000 at 06:03:08PM +0200, Mitja Horvat wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I recently upgraded to FreeBSD 4.1-RELEASE(CD image). I noticed that while
> writing
> to an asynchronously mounted filesystem(mount -o async / ...) all other IO
> operations to the FS are almost blocked. I have only one a
Hi,
I recently upgraded to FreeBSD 4.1-RELEASE(CD image). I noticed that while
writing
to an asynchronously mounted filesystem(mount -o async / ...) all other IO
operations to the FS are almost blocked. I have only one asynchronously
mounted
partition(/) and the following shell script makes the
4 matches
Mail list logo