> I compiled the ISC DHCP client seperately, since the port was marked
> broken in 3.1, but I see it's been fixed in 3.2.
You should not have needed to do that -- see /sbin/dhclient.
(ie, the ISC DHCP client has been part of the base system since just
before 3.1-RELEASE).
Enjoy!
--
-- David
In some mail from Warner Losh, sie said:
>
> In message <199905250629.qaa14...@cheops.anu.edu.au> Darren Reed writes:
> : Does the GENERC (or whatever kernel gets installed for 3.1 by default)
> : have pcic devices in it ?
>
> No. It doesn't. :-(
I tried to build a kernel with it in, although I
In message <199905250629.qaa14...@cheops.anu.edu.au> Darren Reed writes:
: Does the GENERC (or whatever kernel gets installed for 3.1 by default)
: have pcic devices in it ?
No. It doesn't. :-(
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the
In some mail from Warner Losh, sie said:
>
> In message <199905250224.maa11...@cheops.anu.edu.au> Darren Reed writes:
> : pccardd[198]: fatal error: no PC-CARD slots
>
> What does dmesg say? Is pcic0 detected? If so, how many slots did it
> say it had? Do you have controller card and device pc
In message <199905250224.maa11...@cheops.anu.edu.au> Darren Reed writes:
: pccardd[198]: fatal error: no PC-CARD slots
What does dmesg say? Is pcic0 detected? If so, how many slots did it
say it had? Do you have controller card and device pcic in your
config file (see LINT for details)?
Warner
In some mail from Wes Peters, sie said:
>
> Darren Reed wrote:
> >
> > Back when I was running 2.2.8 (and on a different laptop), I used zp0
> > with the 3c589D although it sucked with people recommending using ed0.
> >
> > Does that recommendation hold true for 3.1 ? FWIW, I've tried to boot
>
Darren Reed wrote:
>
> Back when I was running 2.2.8 (and on a different laptop), I used zp0
> with the 3c589D although it sucked with people recommending using ed0.
>
> Does that recommendation hold true for 3.1 ? FWIW, I've tried to boot
> a kernel with both ed0 & zp0 edit'd with "boot -c" but
Back when I was running 2.2.8 (and on a different laptop), I used zp0
with the 3c589D although it sucked with people recommending using ed0.
Does that recommendation hold true for 3.1 ? FWIW, I've tried to boot
a kernel with both ed0 & zp0 edit'd with "boot -c" but neither seem to
be able to pro
8 matches
Mail list logo
