Re: 3.2-STABLE, 11th panic

On Jun 2, 11:40am, "David E. Cross" wrote: } Subject: 3.2-STABLE, 11th panic } Here is a backtrace from our latest. Does anyone have any ideas to try. Is } there any way to loock at who has the other lock on the file? (Yes, I know } it is the kernel who has it, but it is requested on

Re: 3.2-STABLE, 11th panic

JFYI: We are seeing panics with gated running with a big table...seems to be getting memory allocation failure, even though there seems to be plenty of buffers. I dont have any real good info on it yet. Dennis At 11:40 AM 6/2/99 -0400, David E. Cross wrote: >Here is a backtrace from our latest.

3.2-STABLE, 11th panic

Here is a backtrace from our latest. Does anyone have any ideas to try. Is there any way to loock at who has the other lock on the file? (Yes, I know it is the kernel who has it, but it is requested on behalf of a NFSd, no?) (kgdb) bt #0 boot (howto=256) at ../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:285 #1 0