On Fri, May 14, 1999 at 11:55:49AM -0400, David E. Cross wrote:
>
> Well, this is my current config: Dual P2-400, 256M RAM, 256M SWAP, 3.2-BETA,
> maxusers 256. I have yet to have any wierdness. Note we also run servers
> based off of the late 3.1-STABLE branch and we *used* to see KVA problems
> > > has to be "careful" with the configuration (NMBCLUSTERS, MAXUSERS) to
> > > prevent the box from falling over every few days due to kvm problems.
> > >
> > > Can somebody be more specific? I'm just about to order a really, really
> > > expensive machine and I want to be sure I can get it to
On Fri, 14 May 1999, David E. Cross wrote:
> > It's been noted on several occasions that with large (> 256MB) of RAM, one
> > has to be "careful" with the configuration (NMBCLUSTERS, MAXUSERS) to
> > prevent the box from falling over every few days due to kvm problems.
> >
> > Can somebody be m
Chuck Youse writes:
> It's been noted on several occasions that with large (> 256MB) of RAM, one
> has to be "careful" with the configuration (NMBCLUSTERS, MAXUSERS) to
> prevent the box from falling over every few days due to kvm problems.
It's not a problem as long as your kernel address space
> It's been noted on several occasions that with large (> 256MB) of RAM, one
> has to be "careful" with the configuration (NMBCLUSTERS, MAXUSERS) to
> prevent the box from falling over every few days due to kvm problems.
>
> Can somebody be more specific? I'm just about to order a really, really
It's been noted on several occasions that with large (> 256MB) of RAM, one
has to be "careful" with the configuration (NMBCLUSTERS, MAXUSERS) to
prevent the box from falling over every few days due to kvm problems.
Can somebody be more specific? I'm just about to order a really, really
expensive
6 matches
Mail list logo
