Trevor Johnson wrote:
> Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>
> > Is there a way to
> [...]
> > b) mark a port to notify users not to try using it on -STABLE and
> > -CURRENT?
>
> After a look at
> http://www.freebsd.org/porters-handbook/porting-versions.html and at
> src/sys/sys/param.h,v in the CVS tre
Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> Is there a way to
[...]
> b) mark a port to notify users not to try using it on -STABLE and
> -CURRENT?
After a look at
http://www.freebsd.org/porters-handbook/porting-versions.html and at
src/sys/sys/param.h,v in the CVS tree, I made the appended patch.
--
Trevor Jo
[ Jordan, I'm Cc:ing you as release engineer as -STABLE has been partially
broken for nearly three weeks now. ]
On Sat, 3 Jun 2000, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> This causes clear breakage in -STABLE and lots of wasted time for users
> of the Wine port and myself (answering support requests), for exa
On Sun, 4 Jun 2000, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> Ask Peter to commit this patch at least...
Thanks!
Note that Peter has been Cc:ed on all messages concerning this issue, but
didn't reply yet, so I just opened PR misc/19077 and included your patch
there.
Gerald
--
Gerald "Jerry" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Andrey A. Chernov" wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 08:42:47AM +0900, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
> > Huh? I'm obviously missing something here... Why would the branches be
> > damaged by this?
>
> Because they forked. It cause merge troubles on the next import into the
> vendor branch forever.
On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 08:42:47AM +0900, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
> Huh? I'm obviously missing something here... Why would the branches be
> damaged by this?
Because they forked. It cause merge troubles on the next import into the
vendor branch forever.
--
Andrey A. Chernov
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Andrey A. Chernov" wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 04, 2000 at 11:36:47PM +0900, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
> > You revert to the original by applying the reverse patch of your changes
> > and committing that. This can be easily done with cvs. And then you
>
> Are you joking? CVS branches will be damaged b
On Sat, Jun 03, 2000 at 07:10:56PM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> However you do it, please fix this ASAP, and be it by reverting the
Ask Peter to commit this patch at least...
--- include/curses.h.in.bak Wed May 24 14:44:45 2000
+++ include/curses.h.in Mon Jun 5 02:28:33 2000
@@ -1313,8 +1
On Sun, Jun 04, 2000 at 11:36:47PM +0900, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
> You revert to the original by applying the reverse patch of your changes
> and committing that. This can be easily done with cvs. And then you
Are you joking? CVS branches will be damaged by this again.
> changes in the past fir
"Andrey A. Chernov" wrote:
>
> > However you do it, please fix this ASAP, and be it by reverting the
> > original, broken patch!
>
> I wish but I can't. If I'll touch those misterious CVS branches structure
> again, everyone shoot at me as in previous time. I think it is enough for
> me. Nowd
On Sat, Jun 03, 2000 at 07:10:56PM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Fri, 26 May 2000, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> > Yes, #define was a quick solution.
> > We need either to add a stub or to import ncurses author fix (removing
> > all trace function from production library).
> >
> > Latest is bet
On Fri, 26 May 2000, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> Yes, #define was a quick solution.
> We need either to add a stub or to import ncurses author fix (removing
> all trace function from production library).
>
> Latest is better IMHO, but I left to choose best way to Peter.
However you do it, please
12 matches
Mail list logo
