rcorder cache (was [patch] rc.d cleanup)

2005-08-01 Thread diz
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 09:47:54PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote this message on Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 12:29 >> > -0500: >> >> This has the result of reducing the size of the shell code, and >> reducing >> > >> > Unless you cross a fs frag (usually 1024 bytes), i.e.

Re: [patch] rc.d cleanup

2005-08-01 Thread Brooks Davis
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 09:47:54PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote this message on Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 12:29 > > -0500: > >> This has the result of reducing the size of the shell code, and reducing > > > > Unless you cross a fs frag (usually 1024 bytes), i.e. reduce the

Re: [patch] rc.d cleanup

2005-08-01 Thread diz
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>>Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >>> >>> > [...] > >>>Thirded. I far prefer the bigger C-like if statements and think this >>>patch is a huge code churn for what is basically code obfuscation. >>> >>>Cheers, >>>Maxime >>> >>> >> >> >>Well I certainly respect the op

Re: [patch] rc.d cleanup

2005-08-01 Thread diz
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote this message on Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 12:29 > -0500: >> This has the result of reducing the size of the shell code, and reducing > > Unless you cross a fs frag (usually 1024 bytes), i.e. reduce the scripts > by an average of 512bytes *per* script, you will see no disk space

Re: [patch] rc.d cleanup

2005-08-01 Thread Julian Elischer
lets try that again without most of the typos. Julian Elischer wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Giorgos Keramidas wrote: [...] Thirded. I far prefer the bigger C-like if statements and think this patch is a huge code churn for what is basically code obfuscation. Cheers, Maxime

Re: [patch] rc.d cleanup

2005-08-01 Thread Julian Elischer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Giorgos Keramidas wrote: [...] Thirded. I far prefer the bigger C-like if statements and think this patch is a huge code churn for what is basically code obfuscation. Cheers, Maxime Well I certainly respect the opinions, but respectfully when has th

Re: [patch] rc.d cleanup

2005-08-01 Thread John-Mark Gurney
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote this message on Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 12:29 -0500: > This has the result of reducing the size of the shell code, and reducing Unless you cross a fs frag (usually 1024 bytes), i.e. reduce the scripts by an average of 512bytes *per* script, you will see no disk space savings f

Re: [patch] rc.d cleanup

2005-08-01 Thread Frank Mayhar
On Mon, 1 Aug 2005 13:29:00 -0500 (CDT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Well I certainly respect the opinions, but respectfully when has the use > of && and || become obfuscation? Secondly, the use of shell style blocks > of code is similar to the way they are done in C where curly-braces are > used to

Re: [patch] rc.d cleanup

2005-08-01 Thread diz
> Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >> On 2005-08-01 13:55, John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >On Monday 01 August 2005 01:29 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> This patch effects most of the rc.d scripts that utilize simple IF >> >> statements, converting them to logical AND/OR's instead. For exam

Re: [patch] rc.d cleanup

2005-08-01 Thread Maxime Henrion
Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2005-08-01 13:55, John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Monday 01 August 2005 01:29 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> This patch effects most of the rc.d scripts that utilize simple IF > >> statements, converting them to logical AND/OR's instead. For example: >

Re: [patch] rc.d cleanup

2005-08-01 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2005-08-01 13:55, John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Monday 01 August 2005 01:29 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> This patch effects most of the rc.d scripts that utilize simple IF >> statements, converting them to logical AND/OR's instead. For example: >> >> if [ ! -f foo ] >> then >>

Re: [patch] rc.d cleanup

2005-08-01 Thread John Baldwin
On Monday 01 August 2005 01:29 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi there, > > This is my first patch to this project. > This is the first of many patches to come actually, but I need to find a > sponsor to guide me, and review what I submit. The patch is kinda big, and > far reaching in terms of alte

[patch] rc.d cleanup

2005-08-01 Thread diz
Hi there, This is my first patch to this project. This is the first of many patches to come actually, but I need to find a sponsor to guide me, and review what I submit. The patch is kinda big, and far reaching in terms of altering almost every rc.d script. This patch effects most of the rc.d scr