On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> :As for the general concept, I can say it works fine. I built a system
> :with nearly 30 DVD-ram drives on 6 separate scsi channels. At first I
> :tried using a utility that would read from the input image (on hard
> :disk) and write it out to all th
:
:On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Matthew Dillon wrote:
:>
:> There is no multi-target command that I know of. You are absolutely
:> correct in your bandwidth calculations... a SCSI bus should have no
:> problem at all duping the data 8 times to each of 8 CDR's, and the
:> operating syste
On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Matthew Dillon wrote:
>
> There is no multi-target command that I know of. You are absolutely
> correct in your bandwidth calculations... a SCSI bus should have no
> problem at all duping the data 8 times to each of 8 CDR's, and the
> operating system ought t
On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Keith Pitcher wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 07:07:54AM -0400, David Gilbert wrote:
> > Remember: unix is a system whereby you assemble piplelines and scripts
> > of _simple_ programs to create complex behavior. It's not necessary
> > to have a multi-cd tool when you can rol
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 18:27:16 -0400, Keith Pitcher wrote:
> > > I also didn't know that there was a write-to-many SCSI command?
> > > Someone can confirm or deny this
>
> Coulda sworn the raid controller on our main freebsd machine does mirroring
> via scsi with a single command. So I took it
> > I also didn't know that there was a write-to-many SCSI command?
> > Someone can confirm or deny this
Coulda sworn the raid controller on our main freebsd machine does mirroring
via scsi with a single command. So I took it that this was a scsi card ability
and not a raid controller option.
I
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 16:22:56 -0400, David Gilbert wrote:
> > "Keith" == Keith Pitcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Keith> Given the hardware, is there a way to burn 8 CDs at one time,
> Keith> or is there some mirroring code that is well written enough to
> Keith> facilitate it?
>
> I
> "Matthew" == Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Matthew> I'm somewhat interested in knowing that this concept
Matthew> actually works :-)
I used to have a system that was a K6/233 with a 2940W SCSI
controller. It had IDE disks and two SCSI burners... one 1x and one
4x. I foun
:Keith> This is a simplistic and inadequate solution. UNIX was intended
:Keith> to be efficient, not to do eight Times the amount of work of
:Keith> any other system. This uses 8 times the memory, 8 times the
:Keith> processor, and 8 times the bus (only 4 times if two channels,
:Keith> but you ge
> "Keith" == Keith Pitcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Keith> On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 07:07:54AM -0400, David Gilbert wrote:
>> Remember: unix is a system whereby you assemble piplelines and
>> scripts of _simple_ programs to create complex behavior. It's not
>> necessary to have a multi-cd
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 07:07:54AM -0400, David Gilbert wrote:
> Remember: unix is a system whereby you assemble piplelines and scripts
> of _simple_ programs to create complex behavior. It's not necessary
> to have a multi-cd tool when you can roll your own with your own
> behavior.
>
> Dave.
> "Keith" == Keith Pitcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Keith> I hate to bother the list, but after lots of searching I
Keith> haven't found this out - maybe I missed something obvious :
Keith> I have 8 scsi CDRs in a netserver 5 case, need to burn a number
Keith> of CDs. I haven't seen anyt
12 matches
Mail list logo
