Re: [Proof of Concept] Stacked unionfs based 'tinderbox'

2010-02-28 Thread David Naylor
Hi, Apologies for the delayed reply. On Thursday 25 February 2010 15:53:03 Ulrich Spörlein wrote: > On Thu, 25.02.2010 at 10:08:15 +0200, David Naylor wrote: > > Hi, > > > > As some may have noticed on -current I have been working on using > > stacked unionfs to implement a 'tinderbox' type bu

Re: [Proof of Concept] Stacked unionfs based 'tinderbox'

2010-02-25 Thread David Naylor
On 25 February 2010 15:53, Ulrich Spörlein wrote: > On Thu, 25.02.2010 at 10:08:15 +0200, David Naylor wrote: >> Hi, >> >> As some may have noticed on -current I have been working on using >> stacked unionfs to implement a 'tinderbox' type build system.  I have >> successfully used the scripts to

Re: [Proof of Concept] Stacked unionfs based 'tinderbox'

2010-02-25 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
On Thu, 25.02.2010 at 10:08:15 +0200, David Naylor wrote: > Hi, > > As some may have noticed on -current I have been working on using > stacked unionfs to implement a 'tinderbox' type build system. I have > successfully used the scripts to build x11/xorg (and have compared the > results to using

[Proof of Concept] Stacked unionfs based 'tinderbox'

2010-02-25 Thread David Naylor
Hi, As some may have noticed on -current I have been working on using stacked unionfs to implement a 'tinderbox' type build system. I have successfully used the scripts to build x11/xorg (and have compared the results to using the traditional approach using pkg_add). The build system is stable e