Re: [PATCH] Fancy rc startup style RFC - v6

Hey all, My webserver went down earlier this week, and I have moved my mail. I am in the arduous process of getting a new replacement. I apologize for the delay however, on the rc.subr colorization project, and hope to have the newest updates available again soon. -- Coleman Kane __

Re: [PATCH] Fancy rc startup style RFC - v6

Hi, Sorry for replying to an old message, but nobody has responded to this particular question, so I give it a try ... Coleman Kane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > One unfortunate thing about /bin/sh: [from the sh(1) manpage] > > Only one of the -e and -n options may be specifie

Re: [PATCH] Fancy rc startup style RFC - v6

On 4/23/06, Sean Winn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 10:32:33PM -0500, Eric Anderson wrote: > >> Other than that, do we have general consensus that these do what they > >> claim? Any outstanding issues that haven't been addressed? > > > > One re

RE: [PATCH] Fancy rc startup style RFC - v6

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 10:32:33PM -0500, Eric Anderson wrote: >> Other than that, do we have general consensus that these do what they >> claim? Any outstanding issues that haven't been addressed? > > One request: > > Please remove the two seperate rc.conf lines, and

Re: [PATCH] Fancy rc startup style RFC - v6

On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 10:32:33PM -0500, Eric Anderson wrote: > Other than that, do we have general consensus that these do what they > claim? Any outstanding issues that haven't been addressed? One request: Please remove the two seperate rc.conf lines, and replace with just one: rc_fancy= Y

Re: [PATCH] Fancy rc startup style RFC - v6

On 4/21/06, David Barbero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Eric Anderson escribió: > >> After to apply the patch, so that it works is necessary to put in > >> rc.conf > >> rc_fancy="YES ", when put this single entry, the system gives errors > >> saying that correctly this entry in rc.conf is not co

Re: [PATCH] Fancy rc startup style RFC - v6

On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 10:32:33PM -0500, Eric Anderson wrote: > > > This looks good. I only wonder about two things now: > > - Should we also have a line for the actual colors used too? Or is that > going too crazy? > > - Does it meet style(9)? I'm wondering about line lengths now. > > Oth

Re: [PATCH] Fancy rc startup style RFC - v6

Eric Anderson escribió: >> After to apply the patch, so that it works is necessary to put in >> rc.conf >> rc_fancy="YES ", when put this single entry, the system gives errors >> saying that correctly this entry in rc.conf is not correctly defined, >> adding single rc_fancy_color="YES" gives the s

Re: [PATCH] Fancy rc startup style RFC - v6

> Coleman Kane wrote: > > On 4/20/06, *Eric Anderson* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > wrote: > > > > David Barbero wrote: > > > > > --- snip --- > > > > Yep, that's a bug. I think it's fixed in v7, available here: > > > > http://www.googlebit.com/freebs

Re: [PATCH] Fancy rc startup style RFC - v6

On 4/20/06, Eric Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > David Barbero wrote: > > > --- snip --- > Yep, that's a bug. I think it's fixed in v7, available here: > > http://www.googlebit.com/freebsd/patches/rc_fancy.patch-7 > > along with a few other suggestions from others. > > > > Another one of

Re: [PATCH] Fancy rc startup style RFC - v6

On 4/20/06, Eric Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Coleman Kane wrote: > > > > I have modified the patch as follows: > > > > Made a bunch of the settings tunable by the user (message text and field > > widths). > > > > It is availalbe at http://www.cokane.org/files/rc_fancy-cokane2.patch > >

Re: [PATCH] Fancy rc startup style RFC - v6

Coleman Kane wrote: On 4/20/06, *Eric Anderson* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: David Barbero wrote: > --- snip --- Yep, that's a bug. I think it's fixed in v7, available here: http://www.googlebit.com/freebsd/patches/rc_fancy.patch-7 along wi

Re: [PATCH] Fancy rc startup style RFC - v6

David Barbero wrote: Eric Anderson escribió: Thanks to Rick Petty for pointing me in the right direction (man page!), here's the latest, and I think solid patch (for RELENG-6): http://www.googlebit.com/freebsd/patches/rc_fancy.patch-6 Eric Hi all. I have found several anomalies operation

Re: [PATCH] Fancy rc startup style RFC - v6

Eric Anderson escribió: > > Thanks to Rick Petty for pointing me in the right direction (man page!), > here's the latest, and I think solid patch (for RELENG-6): > > > http://www.googlebit.com/freebsd/patches/rc_fancy.patch-6 > > > Eric > Hi all. I have found several anomalies operations in the

Re: [PATCH] Fancy rc startup style RFC - v6

On Wednesday 19 April 2006 16:39, Eric Anderson wrote: > Eric Anderson wrote: > > Eric Anderson wrote: > >> Bill Vermillion wrote: > >>> Somewhere around Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 04:07 , the world stopped > >>> and listened as [EMAIL PROTECTED] graced us with > >>> this profound tidbit of wisdom that w

Re: [PATCH] Fancy rc startup style RFC - v6

Eric Anderson wrote: Eric Anderson wrote: Bill Vermillion wrote: Somewhere around Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 04:07 , the world stopped and listened as [EMAIL PROTECTED] graced us with this profound tidbit of wisdom that would fulfill the enjoyment of future generations: Message: 20 Date: Tue, 18 Ap