On Friday 04 June 2004 04:27 am, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 08:19:11AM -0700, Brooks Davis wrote:
> B> > On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 10:56:52AM -0700, Sam Leffler wrote:
> B> > S> allocated using this mechanism. I did it once for vlan tags but
> botched it B> > S> (didn't handle mo
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 08:19:11AM -0700, Brooks Davis wrote:
B> > On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 10:56:52AM -0700, Sam Leffler wrote:
B> > S> allocated using this mechanism. I did it once for vlan tags but botched it
B> > S> (didn't handle module references properly) so backed it. But there's no
B> >
On Wednesday 02 June 2004 07:12, Bosko Milekic wrote:
>
> If you read the paper on mbuma, you'll notice that I point out that it
> would be worth investigating whether, in scenarios where an m_tag is
> ALWAYS required per packet (e.g., MAC), providing a secondary zone with
> pre-allocated m
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 01:46:26PM +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 10:56:52AM -0700, Sam Leffler wrote:
> S> allocated using this mechanism. I did it once for vlan tags but botched it
> S> (didn't handle module references properly) so backed it. But there's no
> S> reason s
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 10:56:52AM -0700, Sam Leffler wrote:
S> > are you going to convert mbuf tag allocator to UMA? Now
S> > tags are allocated with malloc(). AFAIK, tags are used heavily in pf,
S> > and forthcoming ALTQ. Moving to UMA should affect their performance
S> > positively.
S>
S> You
On Wednesday 02 June 2004 02:49 am, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> Bosko,
>
> On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 02:51:01PM -0700, Bosko Milekic wrote:
> B> mbuma is an Mbuf & Cluster allocator built on top of a number of
> B> extensions to the UMA framework, all included herein.
>
> are you going to convert mbuf
> Bosko,
[deletia]
> are you going to convert mbuf tag allocator to UMA? Now
>tags are allocated with malloc(). AFAIK, tags are used heavily in pf,
>and forthcoming ALTQ. Moving to UMA should affect their performance
>positively.
First off, malloc() *is* UMA. With mbuma in the tree, I don'
Bosko,
On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 02:51:01PM -0700, Bosko Milekic wrote:
B> mbuma is an Mbuf & Cluster allocator built on top of a number of
B> extensions to the UMA framework, all included herein.
are you going to convert mbuf tag allocator to UMA? Now
tags are allocated with malloc(). AFAIK, t
(Hello Chris Haalboom? :-))
Hello,
In order to avoid having to type everything again, I'll refer
to the commit log. PLEASE READ IT IN FULL:
Bring in mbuma to replace mballoc.
mbuma is an Mbuf & Cluster allocator built on top of a number of
extensions to the UMA framework, all included here
9 matches
Mail list logo
