Re: /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_sig.c

> Are these really the revisions you mean? 1.137 is completely harmless, > and 1.48 is limited to the case where you define the undocumented > option "COMPAT_SUNOS". I just ran in to 1.148 and 1.137 seemed to do some harm, but didn't; in C it just works out fine, because of the union... *bwerk*..

Re: /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_sig.c

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Marc Olzheim writes:, Marco van de Voort writes: >While working on tha FreePascal FreeBSD port, we found a bug in the >kernel source, that has been fixed in -CURRENT... >Any reason why pathes 1.137 and 1.148 of kern_sig.c have not yet been >committed to RELENG_4 ?

/usr/src/sys/kern/kern_sig.c

Hi. While working on tha FreePascal FreeBSD port, we found a bug in the kernel source, that has been fixed in -CURRENT... Any reason why pathes 1.137 and 1.148 of kern_sig.c have not yet been committed to RELENG_4 ? Marc & Marco To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe f