Re: "restricted" kernel threads implementation from NetBSD via newconfig

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Julian Elischer writes: : now this is threads within the kernel, and not kernel support for user : threads right? Yes. That's right. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: "restricted" kernel threads implementation from NetBSD via newconfig

In message Julian Elischer writes: : now this is threads within the kernel, and not kernel support for user : threads right? Yes. That's right. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: "restricted" kernel threads implementation from NetBSD via newconfig

:please yes.. :eventually we'll be using it to fire off a thread for every interrupt :source if we go the BSDI way. (as dicussed with various people at USENIX) : :I was actually thinking about this today... : :now this is threads within the kernel, and not kernel support for user :threads right? :

Re: "restricted" kernel threads implementation from NetBSD via newconfig

:please yes.. :eventually we'll be using it to fire off a thread for every interrupt :source if we go the BSDI way. (as dicussed with various people at USENIX) : :I was actually thinking about this today... : :now this is threads within the kernel, and not kernel support for user :threads right? :

Re: "restricted" kernel threads implementation from NetBSD via newconfig

please yes.. eventually we'll be using it to fire off a thread for every interrupt source if we go the BSDI way. (as dicussed with various people at USENIX) I was actually thinking about this today... now this is threads within the kernel, and not kernel support for user threads right? jul

Re: "restricted" kernel threads implementation from NetBSD via newconfig

please yes.. eventually we'll be using it to fire off a thread for every interrupt source if we go the BSDI way. (as dicussed with various people at USENIX) I was actually thinking about this today... now this is threads within the kernel, and not kernel support for user threads right? juli

"restricted" kernel threads implementation from NetBSD via newconfig

I'd like to bring a kernel thread implementation, ported from NetBDS by the newconfig project, into the kernel. Who would like to review things before they go into the tree? I can see many benefits for having this in the tree, but very little downside. This should allow people to more easily p

"restricted" kernel threads implementation from NetBSD via newconfig

I'd like to bring a kernel thread implementation, ported from NetBDS by the newconfig project, into the kernel. Who would like to review things before they go into the tree? I can see many benefits for having this in the tree, but very little downside. This should allow people to more easily po