Re: "find /proc"

2000-10-05 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* void <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001005 15:11] wrote: > On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 04:57:50PM -0500, Chris Costello wrote: > > On Thursday, October 05, 2000, void wrote: > > > Why does find(1) operate non-recursively in /proc? > > > >Because the procfs_readdir() code does not report directories > > a

Re: "find /proc"

2000-10-05 Thread void
On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 04:57:50PM -0500, Chris Costello wrote: > On Thursday, October 05, 2000, void wrote: > > Why does find(1) operate non-recursively in /proc? > >Because the procfs_readdir() code does not report directories > as the correct type (DT_REG as opposed to the proper DT_DIR).

Re: "find /proc"

2000-10-05 Thread Chris Costello
On Thursday, October 05, 2000, void wrote: > Why does find(1) operate non-recursively in /proc? Because the procfs_readdir() code does not report directories as the correct type (DT_REG as opposed to the proper DT_DIR). -- |Chris Costello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |TRAPEZOID - A device for catchin

"find /proc"

2000-10-05 Thread void
Why does find(1) operate non-recursively in /proc? % uname -a FreeBSD example.com 4.1-STABLE FreeBSD 4.1-STABLE #0: Thu Aug 31 22:31:20 EDT 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/EXAMPLE i386 % find /proc /proc /proc/curproc /proc/48643 /proc/48576 /proc/48511 /proc/48510 /proc/48467